Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Heating oil prices

Expert replies
by umaa » Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:55 pm
Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were last year.

A. Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were

B. Heating-oil prices are expected to rice higher this year over last because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil than they did

C. Expectations are for heating-oil prices to be higher this year than last year's because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel fr crude oil more than they did

D. It is the expectation that heating-oil prices will be higher for this year over last because refiners are pauing about $5 a barrel more for crude oil now than what they were

E. It is expected that heating-oil prices will rise higher this year than last year's because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

Which one do you think is right?

THEY WHERE or THEY DID?
What we think, we become
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Re: Heating oil prices

by madhur_ahuja » Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:06 pm
IMO E

they did is definitely better.
Join the discussion

by Spring2009 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 8:45 pm
I think E.
THEY DID.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Aug 13, 2009 9:08 pm
A. Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than last because refiners are paying about $5 a barrel more for crude oil than they were

E. It is expected that heating-oil prices will rise higher this year than last year's because refiners pay about $5 a barrel for crude oil more than they did

"they did" should be better but overall 'E' doesn't seem to be a good choice. I think it should be "are paying"

IMO - A for this one
Join the discussion

by pavell » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:54 am
I think A

E - will rise higher - not good ( see manhattan SC)
Join the discussion

by yalakaluma » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:22 am
in sentence E, I am bothered by the comparaison:

... more this year than last year's...

it is not parallel.

What do you think?

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:58 am
I agree, its A . Rise and higher are redundant.
Join the discussion

by umaa » Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:32 am
OA is A. But my question is, Don't you think the last sentence should end with THE DID?

I feel THEY WERE is reduntant here.
What we think, we become
Join the discussion

by gmatv09 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 7:32 am
Not convinced with OA.
In choice A- they in the subordinate clause refers to refiners or prices. (its not clear)
Correct me if i am wrong
:?
Join the discussion

by vishal1702 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 8:13 am
umaa wrote:OA is A. But my question is, Don't you think the last sentence should end with THE DID?

I feel THEY WERE is reduntant here.
I think contextual usage matters here rather than right or wrong...
They did is correct when you say ......the refiners pay.....more than they did (pay)

They were is correct when you say ......the refiners are paying.....more than they were (paying)
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:18 am
vishal1702 wrote:
umaa wrote:OA is A. But my question is, Don't you think the last sentence should end with THE DID?

I feel THEY WERE is reduntant here.
I think contextual usage matters here rather than right or wrong...
They did is correct when you say ......the refiners pay.....more than they did (pay)

They were is correct when you say ......the refiners are paying.....more than they were (paying)
Q1

Is it that, Since A ends with THAN THEY WERE (paying) it's correct

But In E we have MORE THAN THEY DID (pay) and previous part is REFINERS PAY
so why E is rejected here ??


Q 2
There is yet another example

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines (have been priced to sell, and they are.)

a. have been priced to sell, and they are
b. are priced to sell, and they have
c. are priced to sell, and they do
d. are being priced to sell, and have
e. had been priced to sell, and they have
here IS is C

Is it that , we must place a logical VERB at the end and check whether it's parallel ?
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:15 am
yes verbs must b parallel.
mmslf75 wrote:
vishal1702 wrote:
umaa wrote:OA is A. But my question is, Don't you think the last sentence should end with THE DID?

I feel THEY WERE is reduntant here.
I think contextual usage matters here rather than right or wrong...
They did is correct when you say ......the refiners pay.....more than they did (pay)

They were is correct when you say ......the refiners are paying.....more than they were (paying)
Q1

Is it that, Since A ends with THAN THEY WERE (paying) it's correct

But In E we have MORE THAN THEY DID (pay) and previous part is REFINERS PAY
so why E is rejected here ??


Q 2
There is yet another example

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines (have been priced to sell, and they are.)

a. have been priced to sell, and they are
b. are priced to sell, and they have
c. are priced to sell, and they do
d. are being priced to sell, and have
e. had been priced to sell, and they have
here IS is C

Is it that , we must place a logical VERB at the end and check whether it's parallel ?
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sat Jan 09, 2010 8:57 pm
@sreak

Then why E is rejected in 1st one ?
Join the discussion

by CrazyGmatter » Sat Jan 16, 2010 7:29 pm
I feel E is better compared to A.

"they were" at the end is incorrect..

In E "rise higher" is redundant...
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:05 am
Can someone please tell me valid reasons for rejection of E?
Join the discussion