Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Brutal SC #54

Expert replies
by jangojess » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:57 am
There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fosil fuels; more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990.

A. generated through wind power now than it was
B. generated through wind power now as it was
C. generated through wind power now as was the case
D. now generated through wind power as it was
E. now generated through wind power than was the case

OA : C
Trying hard!!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sandy29 » Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:12 am
Why not B. 'It' is for energy.
Join the discussion

by bakhshaliyev » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:07 am
Still confused... why "B" should not be the right answer? :shock:
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:30 am
bakhshaliyev wrote:Still confused... why "B" should not be the right answer? :shock:
Hi! Old question, but still worth a look.

"it" doesn't refer to anything sensical in this sentence. Let's construct a similar, but simpler, example to illustrate.
More than twice as many people are alive today as was the case in 1960.
vs
More than twice as many people are alive today as they were in 1960.
Does "they" make sense in this statement? No, because we're comparing two facts about the world, not two groups of people.

Similarly, in the sentence in this thread, we're comparing how much energy is generated today to how much energy was generated in 1990; "it" can't refer to the fact of how much energy is/was generated.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:55 am
Thanks Stuart,

You explanation was awesome!!!!
Join the discussion

by bakhshaliyev » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:00 am
Stuart! Thank you so much! I got the difference! ;)
Join the discussion

by anujmalik » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:38 pm
Nice Precise Explanation Stuart!!
Join the discussion

by Subeg Gill » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:53 pm
More than twice as many people are alive today as was the case in 1960.
vs
More than twice as many people are alive today as they were in 1960.
Can't we use the concept of ellipsis here?

e.g.: More than twice as many people are alive today as they were [alive] in 1960.
Can't we say alive is understood here.Because alive is already present in the sentence and we don't have to change the verb also.

So,similarly in original question we have in Op B

we can say as much energy is generated now as it was[generated] in 1990.
Join the discussion

by mundasingh123 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:54 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote: No, because we're comparing two facts about the world, not two groups of people.

Similarly, in the sentence in this thread, we're comparing how much energy is generated today to how much energy was generated in 1990; "it" can't refer to the fact of how much energy is/was generated.
Hi Stuart , Could you explain what u meant by two facts about the world, not two groups of people.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion