BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Brutal SC #54

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:01 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 15 times
by jangojess » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:57 am
There are hopeful signs that we are shifting away from our heavy reliance on fosil fuels; more than ten times as much energy is generated through wind power now than it was in 1990.

A. generated through wind power now than it was
B. generated through wind power now as it was
C. generated through wind power now as was the case
D. now generated through wind power as it was
E. now generated through wind power than was the case

OA : C
Trying hard!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:20 pm

by sandy29 » Thu Sep 27, 2007 4:12 am
Why not B. 'It' is for energy.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

by bakhshaliyev » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:07 am
Still confused... why "B" should not be the right answer? :shock:
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pmFollowed by: 614 members
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:30 am
bakhshaliyev wrote:Still confused... why "B" should not be the right answer? :shock:
Hi! Old question, but still worth a look.

"it" doesn't refer to anything sensical in this sentence. Let's construct a similar, but simpler, example to illustrate.
More than twice as many people are alive today as was the case in 1960.
vs
More than twice as many people are alive today as they were in 1960.
Does "they" make sense in this statement? No, because we're comparing two facts about the world, not two groups of people.

Similarly, in the sentence in this thread, we're comparing how much energy is generated today to how much energy was generated in 1990; "it" can't refer to the fact of how much energy is/was generated.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 amFollowed by: 49 members
Thanked: 77 times

by atulmangal » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:55 am
Thanks Stuart,

You explanation was awesome!!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:55 am
Location: Baku, Azerbaijan

by bakhshaliyev » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:00 am
Stuart! Thank you so much! I got the difference! ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:39 pm

by anujmalik » Fri Apr 29, 2011 1:38 pm
Nice Precise Explanation Stuart!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:47 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by Subeg Gill » Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:53 pm
More than twice as many people are alive today as was the case in 1960.
vs
More than twice as many people are alive today as they were in 1960.
Can't we use the concept of ellipsis here?

e.g.: More than twice as many people are alive today as they were [alive] in 1960.
Can't we say alive is understood here.Because alive is already present in the sentence and we don't have to change the verb also.

So,similarly in original question we have in Op B

we can say as much energy is generated now as it was[generated] in 1990.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 amFollowed by: 26 members
Thanked: 56 times

by mundasingh123 » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:54 am
Stuart Kovinsky wrote: No, because we're comparing two facts about the world, not two groups of people.

Similarly, in the sentence in this thread, we're comparing how much energy is generated today to how much energy was generated in 1990; "it" can't refer to the fact of how much energy is/was generated.
Hi Stuart , Could you explain what u meant by two facts about the world, not two groups of people.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1