BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Hazardous waste

Expert replies
by sam2304 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:00 am
In response to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet division has not increased significantly since 1994.
B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had been produced in 1994.
C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.
D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.
E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

Please explain your pick.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by avik.ch » Mon Jun 11, 2012 8:31 am
In response to mounting public concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous waste generated by its passenger-jet division. - an initiative taken
When the program began in 1994, the division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worker. - result of an action/initiative
Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's program has not met its goal are false. - conclusion.

here, the result signifies the changes in the output/production workers and the conclusion of the goal being effective is based on this statistics.

Only E deals with the number of production workers. Hence this is the correct option.

if we negate E - the number of production workers was significantly less in 1994 than last year. : this completely destroy the argument.

1994 --- 100 workers --- output 9000 pounds ---- 90 pounds/person
last year --- X -------- Y ----- 40 pounds/person.

If X decreases then Y too decreases then this would show some other factor for the result to stand, thus undermining the conclusion.

Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:00 am
@avik: I just have one query. Do you try negating every answer choice while solving assumption questions or do you use it to cross check it ? Either way it takes time for me and I mess it up :).
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:53 pm
sam2304 wrote:@avik: I just have one query. Do you try negating every answer choice while solving assumption questions or do you use it to cross check it ? Either way it takes time for me and I mess it up :).
In this CR, negation technique is a good way to find the correct answer as we are looking for "necessary assumption".

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends ?

But if the question were phrased as :

The conclusion of the argument follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

and E were changed to :

The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was same in 1994 as it was last year.

After negation : The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not same in 1994 as it was last year.

"not same" can be increase or decrease.

Increase : this would support the argument
Decrease : this would weaken the assumption.

so here the complete negation technique does not work.
-------------

Please refer testluv's post on this concept:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/verdland-t48086.html#203040
https://www.beatthegmat.com/west-side-sc ... 56337.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/private-indu ... 81524.html

And refer Og-12 #58, which is a sufficient assumption question.


Hope this helps !!
Join the discussion

by avik.ch » Mon Jun 11, 2012 9:57 pm
sorry !! duplicate post
Join the discussion