BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Hazardous waste of Jet production

Expert replies
by singhag » Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:36 pm
In response to mounting pubic concern, an airplane manufacturer implemented a program
with the well-publicized goal of reducing by half the total yearly amount of hazardous
waste generated by its passenger-jet division. When the program began in 1994, the
division's hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was
40 pounds per production worker. Clearly, therefore, charges that the manufacturer's
program has not met its goal are false.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The amount of nonhazardous waste generated each year by the passenger-jet
division has not increased significantly since 1994.
B. At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had
been produced in 1994.
C. Since 1994, other divisions in the company have achieved reductions in hazardous
waste output that are at least equal to that achieved in the passenger-jet division.
D. The average number of weekly hours per production worker in the passenger-jet
division was not significantly greater last year than it was in 1994.
E. The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not
significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by srivas » Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:14 pm
hazardous waste output was 90 pounds per production worker; last year it was 40 pounds per production worke

it is B
Gmat710,, Hyd
Join the discussion

by singhag » Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:44 pm
OA B
Join the discussion

waste of Jet production

by shankykm » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:46 am
@ srivas,
Could u explain how B wins over E? Because in stimulus they have told us emission " per production worker". In E it has told us that the no.of workers in company is same as in 1994 which could be true and supports the conclusion directly. If E is true then the argument makes more sense. Please correct me if am over looking something.
Join the discussion

its B

by sunnychopra » Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:59 pm
Its mentioned, X pounds per worker. So it doesn't depends upon the number of workers rather author is talking more about the production of aircrafts.
Join the discussion

by gauravgundal » Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:06 pm
Are you sure aboutthe OA-b i doubt. It must be E
Join the discussion

B is suffice

by gmatmachoman » Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:55 am
IMO B

Explanation:
B says :At least as many passenger jets were produced by the division last year as had
been produced in 1994


For example ,let's assume that 5 workers are required to produce a passenger jet.Let's again assume in 1994 ,20 passenger jets are produced.So it implies 20X5=100 production workers were involved in 1994 and liberated a waste of 90X100 units.

Now as per B ,if we try to negate that less passenger Jets are produced ,then the charges will become true.

So for the charges to become false ,we need to assume that number of passenger jets produced is same in 1994 & at present also.

Let's come to option E:The number of production workers assigned to the passenger-jet division was not
significantly less in 1994 than it was last year.

Please have a look at the trem " assigned".It not necessarily means that all the production workers have been utilised for the production.

Above all ,the number of production of passenger jets weighs more than that number of production workers assigned.

Please correct me if I am wrong in my explanation.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:23 pm
The official answer is B. But I don't understand why? Can anyone explain
Join the discussion