BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Have swept or Had swept from OG12/4

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:16 am
Of all the vast tides of migration that have swept

through history, maybe none is more concentrated as

the wave that brought 12 million immigrants onto

American shores in little more than three decades.

(A) maybe none is more concentrated as
(B) it may be that none is more concentrated as
(C) perhaps it is none that is more concentrated
than
(D) maybe it is none that was more concentrated
than
(E) perhaps none was more concentrated than

Souce OG 12.
Agreed OA is E.

My query is : "have swept" is present perfect but I suppose we should use "past perfect"(had swept) in that place.

plz share ur view.Guys the craziest thing that happened today is after solving 50 Kaplan SC questions at a strecth ,I tried some OG CR questions..But without solving them as CR, I was looking those sentences for any SC errors..

Hahaha!!
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by komal » Sat Mar 06, 2010 4:45 am
My query is : "have swept" is present perfect but I suppose we should use "past perfect"(had swept) in that place.

Here's my take :

Present Perfect tense shows something that has happened in the PAST, that may or may not yet be completed. It often suggests that the past action is influencing events in the present.

Past Perfect tense tense is used to show action that was started and completed in the past.

In the above passage nothing suggests that 'migration' started and completed in the past. Hence usage of 'have swept' is correct.
[/quote]
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:21 am
Komal,

here both are actions are taken place in the "past"..Agreed right?? If so why are we using Have swept (present perfect) and was(past tense) for the 2 actions??

Are we not shifting the tenses??

I guess if we use Had swept & was...(Both the actions are mentioned in past perfect & past tense respectively) will be fitting.
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:37 am
guys, just a clue, dont know it really helps

present perfect tense is used when the event started in the past and still in action or event has completed and its effect is still being observed. Clearly, this example is latter case...the migration happened in the past but arent those migrated people still a part of US ? they are, so the effect is still there, hence present perfect...
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:45 am
iamcste wrote:guys, just a clue, dont know it really helps

present perfect tense is used when the event started in the past and still in action or event has completed and its effect is still being observed. Clearly, this example is latter case...the migration happened in the past but arent those migrated people still a part of US ? they are, so the effect is still there, hence present perfect...
Agreed. If that is the case why are using past tense "was" in the underlined portion as mentioned as OA(E).

It should be as:

Of all the vast tides of migration that have swept

through history, perhaps none is more concentrated than
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:08 am
gmatmachoman wrote:
iamcste wrote:guys, just a clue, dont know it really helps

present perfect tense is used when the event started in the past and still in action or event has completed and its effect is still being observed. Clearly, this example is latter case...the migration happened in the past but arent those migrated people still a part of US ? they are, so the effect is still there, hence present perfect...
Agreed. If that is the case why are using past tense "was" in the underlined portion as mentioned as OA(E).

It should be as:

Of all the vast tides of migration that have swept

through history, perhaps none is more concentrated than
I see your point dude, may be its good idea to ping Ron or Stuart or testLuv. stacy is out till 08.03,

what you think?? experttttttttttttttsssssssssss?

also, there is something which tells me "is" is incorrect and I am not able to put it across, did the same thing happen to you...also are you going by the rule that most of times "past perfect" for the oldest event and simple past for the past event..but we have to notice here oldest event is migration and its effect can still be there, so we need to get it confirmed from the experts an exception to the usual present perfect/past perfect rule...great find machoman...lets stay tuned...
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:11 am
Note: Past perfect is applied when there are 2 events in the past. The one occuring later in the past time line is assigned the past tense and the event occuring after the first event is assigned simple past.

Here we are referring to all the migration that have occured in history. Note: Present perfect implies an event that started in the past and is applied until now. We are comparing all the migrations that have occured until today. Here there is no past event. The event has started in the past and is applied to even today. When there are no 2 events in the past, how will past perfect be suitable??
Got it??

Hope i have cleared ur doubt!
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:14 am
fibbonnaci wrote:Note: Past perfect is applied when there are 2 events in the past. The one occuring later in the past time line is assigned the past tense and the event occuring after the first event is assigned simple past.

Here we are referring to all the migration that have occured in history. Note: Present perfect implies an event that started in the past and is applied until now. We are comparing all the migrations that have occured until today. Here there is no past event. The event has started in the past and is applied to even today. When there are no 2 events in the past, how will past perfect be suitable??
Got it??

Hope i have cleared ur doubt!
so why do we have ....none "was"?
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:34 am
iamcste wrote:
fibbonnaci wrote:Note: Past perfect is applied when there are 2 events in the past. The one occuring later in the past time line is assigned the past tense and the event occuring after the first event is assigned simple past.

Here we are referring to all the migration that have occured in history. Note: Present perfect implies an event that started in the past and is applied until now. We are comparing all the migrations that have occured until today. Here there is no past event. The event has started in the past and is applied to even today. When there are no 2 events in the past, how will past perfect be suitable??
Got it??

Hope i have cleared ur doubt!
so why do we have ....none "was"?
dude that toning was awesome..hahahhahah...Guys plz forgive me if i am blowing out things out of proportion!

fibo..plz plz answer that!!!
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Sat Mar 06, 2010 7:49 am
one event that occured in the past is being compared to all the events that have occured till now.
So the past event is denoted with a simple past . This past event (ie. one specific event that has occured in the past- that event that got 12 million immigrants) is compared to all the events until now( ie all the events in the past and all the events till now. so what tense is needed for an event has started in the past and is applicable even today? That is the reason why we denote all the other events in the present perfect!)

Hope this clarifies!
Join the discussion

by iamcste » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:17 am
fibbonnaci wrote:one event that occured in the past is being compared to all the events that have occured till now.
So the past event is denoted with a simple past . This past event (ie. one specific event that has occured in the past- that event that got 12 million immigrants) is compared to all the events until now( ie all the events in the past and all the events till now. so what tense is needed for an event has started in the past and is applicable even today? That is the reason why we denote all the other events in the present perfect!)

Hope this clarifies!
Fibo..thanks for your comments

i think we are getting close but somethings are still not clear to me. " the wave that brought..." in the past tense is used for the event that brought 12 million immirgants...

"None ( of all those events ) was more concentrated than" so none is associated with all the other events including present migrations, Is still "was" justified?
Join the discussion

by rohan_vus » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:24 am
Quality discussion !!!
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Sat Mar 06, 2010 8:33 am
rohan_vus wrote:Quality discussion !!!
Rohan..rohan..

Credit goes to me right???Hahahha So only I brought in Fibo on the table....

Dude...to start with Komal started..and few others pitched in.....and Iamcste.. paved the way..and fibo was well enuf to sustain...

yeah agreed this one is a quality discussion as I expected it to be....!!

I shall ping TesLuv to share his TP..

Lovely Guys,keep debating...Virtual debates are the best reality shows...!!
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1