Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Harold's Time

Expert replies
by sandipgumtya » Thu Sep 17, 2015 9:38 pm
Last year Harold's average time to finish the qualifying event was three hours. If he knows that he can increase his speed this year by 20%, how many minutes should it take him to complete the event?
A-150
B-144
C-120
D-90
E-36
I know this is very simple prob.I am getting ans B but OA is A
Help
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by theCEO » Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:18 am
sandipgumtya wrote:Last year Harold's average time to finish the qualifying event was three hours. If he knows that he can increase his speed this year by 20%, how many minutes should it take him to complete the event?
A-150
B-144
C-120
D-90
E-36
I know this is very simple prob.I am getting ans B but OA is A
Help
The distance before and after will be the same.
speed = distance/time
distance = speed x time

therefore speed before x time before = new speed x new time
S X T = 1.2S X T/1.2

T/1.2 = 180/1.2 = 1800/12 = 150

ANS= A
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:26 am
sandipgumtya wrote:Last year Harold's average time to finish the qualifying event was three hours. If he knows that he can increase his speed this year by 20%, how many minutes should it take him to complete the event?
A-150
B-144
C-120
D-90
E-36
20% faster = 120% of last year's speed = 6/5 of last year's speed.
Rate and time are RECIPROCALS.
6/5 of last year's speed implies 5/6 of last year's time:
(5/6)(3 hours) = (5/6)(180 minutes) = 150 minutes.

The correct answer is A.

Alternate approach:
Let last year's speed = 10 feet per minute.
Since last year Harold traveled at a speed of 10 feet per minute for 180 minutes, the total distance = rt = 10*180 = 1800 feet.
If the speed is increased by 20% to 12 feet per minute, the time to travel 1800 feet = d/r = 1800/12 = 150 minutes.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Bullzi » Fri Sep 18, 2015 3:37 am
Hello..

My approach,

1. rate x time = distance
2. Convert 3 hours to 180 mins as all answer options are minutes
3. LY - r x 180 = d
4. TY - (120/100)r x t = d
5. Solve #4 after substituting value of d from #3
6. (12/10)t = 180 --> t = 150

Bullzi
Join the discussion

by sandipgumtya » Fri Sep 18, 2015 5:40 am
Hello Mitch,
20% reduction of 3 hr equals 144 mins.Isn't it?Where am i going wrong?
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:19 am
Hi sandipgumtya,

We're told that the SPEED is 20% faster; with your math, you're attempting to manipulate the TIME, which is why that result is incorrect.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by sandipgumtya » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:29 am
As speed and time are inversely proportional,20% faster means 20% lesser time.Is this concept wrong. Pl correct me in detail.
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Fri Sep 18, 2015 9:51 am
Hi sandipgymtya,

Percent Change is calculated based on the ORIGINAL numbers involved. While speed and time ARE related, their respective percent changes are NOT the same.

Assuming that the distance stays the same, Increasing a speed by 20% decreases the time by 16 1/6% (not 20%).

Here's why:

Original speed and time:
D = (R)(T)

20% increase in speed:
D = (6/5)(R)(5/6)(T)

Since the distance is the same, the (6/5) is 'cancelled out' by the (5/6) - the speed increased by 1/5 (or 20%), but the time decreased by 1/6 (or 16 1/6%).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by sandipgumtya » Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:43 am
thanks Rich for this nice explanation.got it clear now.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Sep 18, 2015 1:04 pm
sandipgumtya wrote:As speed and time are inversely proportional,20% faster means 20% lesser time.Is this concept wrong. Pl correct me in detail.
As noted above:

20% faster = (120/100)r = (6/5)r.
Since rate and time are reciprocals:
(6/5)r --> (5/6)t --> 1/6 less time.

Other examples:

50% faster = (150/100)r = (3/2)r.
Since rate and time are reciprocals:
(3/2)r --> (2/3)t --> 1/3 less time.

20% slower = (80/100)r = (4/5)r.
Since rate and time are reciprocals:
(4/5)r --> (5/4)t = 1/4 more time.

50% slower = (50/100)r = (1/2)r.
Since rate and time are reciprocals:
(1/2)r --> 2t --> twice the time.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

hi

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Mon Dec 11, 2017 10:46 am
sandipgumtya wrote:Last year Harold's average time to finish the qualifying event was three hours. If he knows that he can increase his speed this year by 20%, how many minutes should it take him to complete the event?
A-150
B-144
C-120
D-90
E-36
Recall that rate x time = job (or rate = job/time, or time = job/rate). Since Harold’s time to complete the event was 3 hours, we can say that his rate was 1 job per 3 hours; i.e., his rate is 1/3. Since he’s increasing his speed by 20%, his new rate is:

(1/3) x 1.2

(1/3) x 12/10 = 4/10 = 2/5

Since his new rate is 2/5, his new time is 1/(2/5) = 5/2 = 2.5 hours. Thus he can complete the event in 2.5 x 60 = 150 minutes.

Answer: A

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Join the discussion