BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Hard Question

Expert replies
by Uva@90 » Sat Jun 13, 2015 9:35 pm
Hi All,

It is pretty hard to understand this question.

McBride: The proposed new fuel efficiency standards, if implemented, will
discourage the manufacture of full-size cars. This prospect is troubling because
when a subcompact and a full-size car collide, the people in the subcompact
are more likely to be seriously injured than if theirs had also been a full-size car.
The new fuel efficiency standards should therefore be opposed.

Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone
will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither of the
cars is full-size. Thus, the new fuel efficiency standards should be supported
precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.

McBride's and Leggett's statements commit them to disagreeing about the
truth of which one of the following?

(A) The manufacture of full-size cars should be discouraged.
(B) Fuel conservation is less important than safety in the event of a
collision.
(C) When a full-size car and a subcompact car collide, the occupants of the
full-size car are less likely than the occupants of the subcompact car to
the seriously injured.
(D) Reducing the number of full-size cars on the highway will reduce the
frequency of collisions between automobiles.
(E) The new fuel-efficiency standards will encourage automobile
manufacturers to build more subcompact cars.

OA A

I am not able to understand the Question Stem itself.
Does it say "to which option does both of them disagree ??"

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Uva.
Known is a drop Unknown is an Ocean
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by theCEO » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:14 am
Uva@90 wrote:Hi All,

It is pretty hard to understand this question.

McBride: The proposed new fuel efficiency standards, if implemented, will
discourage the manufacture of full-size cars. This prospect is troubling because
when a subcompact and a full-size car collide, the people in the subcompact
are more likely to be seriously injured than if theirs had also been a full-size car.
The new fuel efficiency standards should therefore be opposed.

Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone
will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither of the
cars is full-size. Thus, the new fuel efficiency standards should be supported
precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.

McBride's and Leggett's statements commit them to disagreeing about the
truth of which one of the following?

(A) The manufacture of full-size cars should be discouraged.
(B) Fuel conservation is less important than safety in the event of a
collision.
(C) When a full-size car and a subcompact car collide, the occupants of the
full-size car are less likely than the occupants of the subcompact car to
the seriously injured.
(D) Reducing the number of full-size cars on the highway will reduce the
frequency of collisions between automobiles.
(E) The new fuel-efficiency standards will encourage automobile
manufacturers to build more subcompact cars.

OA A

I am not able to understand the Question Stem itself.
Does it say "to which option does both of them disagree ??"

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Uva.
Yes, the question is asking which option do they disagree with.

Mcbride: oppose standard because it discourage the manaufacture of fullsize cars.
Leggett: support standard because it discourage the manaufacture of fullsize cars.

Based on these statements, they disagree on whether to discourage the manufacture of fullsize cars.
Therefore answer = A
Join the discussion

by Uva@90 » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:27 am
theCEO wrote:
Uva@90 wrote:Hi All,

It is pretty hard to understand this question.

McBride: The proposed new fuel efficiency standards, if implemented, will
discourage the manufacture of full-size cars. This prospect is troubling because
when a subcompact and a full-size car collide, the people in the subcompact
are more likely to be seriously injured than if theirs had also been a full-size car.
The new fuel efficiency standards should therefore be opposed.

Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone
will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither of the
cars is full-size. Thus, the new fuel efficiency standards should be supported
precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.

McBride's and Leggett's statements commit them to disagreeing about the
truth of which one of the following?

(A) The manufacture of full-size cars should be discouraged.
(B) Fuel conservation is less important than safety in the event of a
collision.
(C) When a full-size car and a subcompact car collide, the occupants of the
full-size car are less likely than the occupants of the subcompact car to
the seriously injured.
(D) Reducing the number of full-size cars on the highway will reduce the
frequency of collisions between automobiles.
(E) The new fuel-efficiency standards will encourage automobile
manufacturers to build more subcompact cars.

OA A

I am not able to understand the Question Stem itself.
Does it say "to which option does both of them disagree ??"

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Uva.
Yes, the question is asking which option do they disagree with.

Mcbride: oppose standard because it discourage the manaufacture of fullsize cars.
Leggett: support standard because it discourage the manaufacture of fullsize cars.

Based on these statements, they disagree on whether to discourage the manufacture of fullsize cars.
Therefore answer = A
Hi TheCEO,

Ahh... my bad I thought in other way...

I though to which option they both dont agree(i.e. each separately dont agree with answer option).

Now I got it. One person agree and another person disagree.

Didn't get the question clearly...my bad :(
It is actually easy question in that case...

Thanks for pointing out it.

Regards,
Uva.
Known is a drop Unknown is an Ocean
Join the discussion

by theCEO » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:37 am
Uva@90 wrote:
theCEO wrote:
Uva@90 wrote:Hi All,

It is pretty hard to understand this question.

McBride: The proposed new fuel efficiency standards, if implemented, will
discourage the manufacture of full-size cars. This prospect is troubling because
when a subcompact and a full-size car collide, the people in the subcompact
are more likely to be seriously injured than if theirs had also been a full-size car.
The new fuel efficiency standards should therefore be opposed.

Leggett: But whenever any two cars collide, it is more likely that someone
will be seriously injured if one of the cars is a full-size car than if neither of the
cars is full-size. Thus, the new fuel efficiency standards should be supported
precisely because they discourage the manufacture of full-size cars.

McBride's and Leggett's statements commit them to disagreeing about the
truth of which one of the following?

(A) The manufacture of full-size cars should be discouraged.
(B) Fuel conservation is less important than safety in the event of a
collision.
(C) When a full-size car and a subcompact car collide, the occupants of the
full-size car are less likely than the occupants of the subcompact car to
the seriously injured.
(D) Reducing the number of full-size cars on the highway will reduce the
frequency of collisions between automobiles.
(E) The new fuel-efficiency standards will encourage automobile
manufacturers to build more subcompact cars.

OA A

I am not able to understand the Question Stem itself.
Does it say "to which option does both of them disagree ??"

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Uva.
Yes, the question is asking which option do they disagree with.

Mcbride: oppose standard because it discourage the manaufacture of fullsize cars.
Leggett: support standard because it discourage the manaufacture of fullsize cars.

Based on these statements, they disagree on whether to discourage the manufacture of fullsize cars.
Therefore answer = A
Hi TheCEO,

Ahh... my bad I thought in other way...

I though to which option they both dont agree(i.e. each separately dont agree with answer option).

Now I got it. One person agree and another person disagree.

Didn't get the question clearly...my bad :(
It is actually easy question in that case...

Thanks for pointing out it.

Regards,
Uva.
Hi Uva@90,

The purpose of these questions is to confuse us all :). I do see how the question is worded for you to think that it meant "they both don't agree".
Join the discussion