BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Hard Data Question: 9^x + 9^-x = b?

Expert replies
by abcdefg » Wed Jun 24, 2009 7:21 am
This is from OG Review 11th edition p. 290, #142.

If X is an integer, is 9^x + 9^-x = b?
2) x> 0 = b.

The book says that the second condition "x > 0 = b" is not sufficient because it gives no information about the relationship between x and b.

However I see it as this: "9^b + 1/(9^b) = b". This equation can't happen so it does answer the question posed. Thus the second condition is sufficient.

Anyone know what's up? Thanks!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by rajshree.misra » Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:07 am
I agree with you. Anyone else with a different idea?
Join the discussion

Re: Hard Data Question: 9^x + 9^-x = b?

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:46 am
abcdefg wrote:
2) x> 0 = b.

The book says that the second condition "x > 0 = b" is not sufficient because it gives no information about the relationship between x and b.
That's not what the book says; Statement 2 of that question simply reads 'x > 0'.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by abcdefg » Wed Jun 24, 2009 2:22 pm
hmmm really? I'm looking at the page right now and it's showing me "x > 0 = b". I have OG 11th edition published in 2005. p. 290.

This isnt the first time where something like this has happened in my book. i wonder what's going on. Thanks for the info!
Join the discussion

by Ian Stewart » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:14 pm
Perhaps you have one of the early printings of OG11, which had a few typos. If you search google for Official Guide corrections, there's an official pdf file that lists the errors. I don't recall seeing the one from this question on that list, however.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion

by dmateer25 » Wed Jun 24, 2009 4:42 pm
I have the same edition. It does indeed say x > 0 = b.

I don't see it in the corrections I printed out either.
Join the discussion