BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Harbor Porpoises---Assumption

Expert replies
by amysky_0205 » Sun Mar 10, 2013 6:13 pm
To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts. The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away. Since the installation of the alarms, the average number of porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month. The alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The use of acoustic alarms increases the number of commercial fish caught by the fishing company's boats.

B. When disoriented, harbor porpoises are not significantly more likely to be killed by other boats.

C. Environmentalists advocate the use of acoustic alarms as a means of protecting the harbor porpoise population.

D. The alarms were installed at the time of year when harbor porpoises are most plentiful in the Massachusetts waters.

E. The cost of installing acoustic alarms on fishing boats is less than the cost of repairing nets damaged by harbor porpoises.

OA: B

can someone explain this one?

I chose D instead of the right answer.

thank you so much!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by srcc25anu » Sun Mar 10, 2013 8:47 pm
If we negate B the conclusion falls apart that alarms are not saving the lives of porpoises. If when disoriented, the porpoises were killed in large by other boats, the conclusion would not hold water. Hence it is an assumption that the porpoises saved one way (by alarms) is not killed in large numbers by any other way. Hence B is correct assumption.
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:10 am
I am not quite convinced with the OA .The statement is talking about saving porpoises that could not get entangled in the net and not those that encounter a natural death. B talks about the latter.

Though I am not very convinced with D, it still picked it considering the point I put forth.

Whats the source of this question?
Join the discussion

by himu » Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:24 am
amysky_0205 whats the source of this Q ?

Also, +1 for B.

@Deepthi Subbu as @srcc25anu correctly pointed negating B makes the conclusion fall apart.

Premise 1 :
To prevent harbor porpoises from getting tangled in its nets and suffocating, a fishing company installed acoustic alarms on all its boats that fish in waters off Massachusetts.
Premise 2 : The sound emitted temporarily disorients the porpoises and frightens them away
Premise 3: porpoises caught in the company's nets has dropped from eight to one per month

Conclusion : alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters.


NOw, consider that due to alarms, the porpoises frightened & them away & when they are moving away they are significantly more likely to be killed by other boats.
THEN THE CONCLUSION : ---> alarms, therefore, are saving the lives of harbor porpoises in those waters *COMPLETELY* falls apart !

Hope this help,
Cheers,
~Himu.
Join the discussion

by Ankur87 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 8:27 am
Deepthi Subbu wrote:I am not quite convinced with the OA .The statement is talking about saving porpoises that could not get entangled in the net and not those that encounter a natural death. B talks about the latter.

Though I am not very convinced with D, it still picked it considering the point I put forth.

Whats the source of this question?
B is the best answer out of all 5 options.


The fishing company wants to prevent harbor porpoises. They don't want harbor porpoises to be killed (like it is mentioned that "saving the lives of harbor porpoises").

If we negate B :
When disoriented, harbor porpoises are significantly more likely to be killed by other boats.

Then the argument will fall apart.

So this is the correct answer.
Hope this explanation helps.
Join the discussion