BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Guitar strings_Evaluate

Expert replies
by gmat_perfect » Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:05 pm
Guitar strings often go "dead"--become less responsive and bright in tone--after a few weeks of intense use. A researcher whose son is a classical guitarist hypothesized that dirt and oil, rather than changes in the material properties of the string, were responsible.

Which of the following investigations is most likely to yield significant information that would help to evaluate the researcher's hypothesis?

(A) Determining if a metal alloy is used to make the strings used by classical guitarists
(B) Determining whether classical guitarists make their strings go dead faster than do folk guitarists
(C) Determining whether identical lengths of string, of the same gauge, go dead at different rates when strung on various brands of guitars
(D) Determining whether a dead string and a new string produce different qualities of sound
(E) Determining whether smearing various substances on new guitar strings causes them to go dead

Answer: E

Please discuss the way how to attack evaluate CR's and then explain every option on the basis of the way.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by kstv » Thu Mar 11, 2010 7:14 am
Guitar strings often go "dead"--become less responsive and bright in tone--after a few weeks of intense use. A researcher whose son is a classical guitarist hypothesized that dirt and oil, rather than changes in the material properties of the string, were responsible.

option (E) Determining whether smearing various substances on new guitar strings causes them to go dead. Of the various substance he will use some will be oily and greasy. The +ve or -ve result will help him to conclude whether dirt and oil make the guitar dead.
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:12 am
Yes E will be the answer.

The researcher tells us that dirt and oil rather than material properties of the string are responsible for strings to go dead and ques asks which investigation will evaluate the researcher hypothesis. and therefore if we apply various substances on the string and see the result then we will see what the substance working on the string.
Join the discussion

by mohit11 » Fri Mar 12, 2010 9:19 am
Guitar strings often go "dead"--become less responsive and bright in tone--after a few weeks of intense use. A researcher whose son is a classical guitarist hypothesized that dirt and oil, rather than changes in the material properties of the string, were responsible.

Effect : Guitar Strings go dead after few weeks of intense use
Cause: Dirt and oil and not changes in material properties.

What do we need to do help the classical guitarist's son? Prove that either Dirt and Oil cause guitar strings to go dead or prove that changes in material properties don't make guitar strings to go dead..

Lets attack the options.

Which of the following investigations is most likely to yield significant information that would help to evaluate the researcher's hypothesis?

(A) Determining if a metal alloy is used to make the strings used by classical guitarists - Ok, but we can't prove what causes the strings to go dead. OUT
(B) Determining whether classical guitarists make their strings go dead faster than do folk guitarists - Out of scope
(C) Determining whether identical lengths of string, of the same gauge, go dead at different rates when strung on various brands of guitars - rates at which strings go dead is not the question, OUT
(D) Determining whether a dead string and a new string produce different qualities of sound - Qualities of sound..out of scope
(E) Determining whether smearing various substances on new guitar strings causes them to go dead - If smearing different substances on guitar strings cause them to go dead then we can prove that Dirt and Oil can cause guitar strings to go dead. Its not as direct as "Determining whether smearing dirt and oil on new guitar strings causes them to go dead" but its close.

E it is by POE.
Join the discussion