BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Groups

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ssbhowmick » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:31 pm
I think it is A..

If the number of spending bill for X is less than Y but the sum of the amount of each bill for X exceeds Y (no matter how much tax payer money is involved), then the calculation will be wrong. .

Not sure whether I am right or not.. !!
Peace
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:41 pm
IMO B

I am not sure If I understood the question correctly.

My guess would be B, since if we take B into effect, number of members in X or Y would alter the result.
Join the discussion

by arorag » Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:52 pm
To me C is more appropriate... As all the bills are going to pass anyways then allegation of more spending of tax payer money is useless
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:17 pm
Conclusion:

Congressional members of X authorize more spending of tax payer's dollars than members of part Y.

Premise:

More spending bills were passed.

Assumption: The fewer spending bills of Y dont spend more taxpayers' dollars then the more spending bills of X.

Answer choice A handles this.

Hence A.
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:35 am
OA - A
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:38 pm
Answer A seems to be logical one out of other answer choices
Join the discussion