BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Grizzly bear

Expert replies
by usualsuspect » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:08 am
The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.
1. Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?
(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal.
(B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were.
(C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness.
(D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a hunderstorm.
(E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases.
--------------------------------
2. Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively undermine the author’s argument?
(A) Although the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is very small, the total number of lightning fatalities is many times greater.
(B) Electric blenders are among the safest household appliances; were the author to compare fatalities from electrical appliances in general, she would get a much higher figure.
(C) Most people would rather take their chances with blenders and golf games than with grizzly bears.
(D) Bears in general—including black, brown, and cinnamon bears, as well as grizzly bears—kill many more people than do electric blenders.
(E) Statistics show that the number of times people use electric blenders each year exceeds the number of times people play golf each year, which in turn far exceeds the number of contacts people have with grizzly bears each year
Aëtou gēras, korydou neotēs.
"An eagle's old age (is worth) a sparrow's youth".
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by S0laris » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:32 am
1 - C - Author built his argument on statistical data(numbers of lethal ends)
2- E(reveals statistical weakness by comparing total possible interactions to the total lethal outcomes)


BTW ! OA ?
Last edited by S0laris on Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by usualsuspect » Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am
OA's are:
[spoiler]1. C
2. E[/spoiler]
Aëtou gēras, korydou neotēs.
"An eagle's old age (is worth) a sparrow's youth".
Join the discussion

by dendude » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:51 pm
Agree on C & E respectively.

Q1
C - correctly depicts the relation between # of deaths to the danger factor (Is dangerousness a word??)
As opposed to E which tries to establish a relation between Danger and the deaths in majority of cases, which is out of scope.

Q2
E - this seems to be the straightforward choice.
Indicates that just because the # of people killed is equal does not mean that the # of people exposed to that danger is the same. Infact suggests that the danger factor of a grizzly bear is probably more than the others.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Wed Mar 11, 2009 7:08 pm
C is defender assumption

E make evidence representative
Join the discussion

by delhiboy1979 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:26 am
Can someone explain what is wrong with option E in the 1st question (umm I picked that one)
Join the discussion

by S0laris » Fri Mar 13, 2009 6:59 am
delhiboy1979 wrote:Can someone explain what is wrong with option E in the 1st question (umm I picked that one)
Try to compare these:

1 How many probable outcomes, out of 10 meetings, to survive when U encounter grizzly ?

2 How many probable outcomes, out of 10 cases, to survive when U use blenders ?
we are the champions !
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 11:37 am
Thanks for the replies. I too marked C and E
Join the discussion