-
goelmohit2002
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Edited.
Last edited by goelmohit2002 on Sun Aug 16, 2009 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Look closely at E. "that is sitting" and "it provides" is not parallel. Also sits is preferred to is sitting. I believe it has to do with active voice.goelmohit2002 wrote:Hi All,
In the below question OA is D. Can someone please tell what is the problem with E ?
As per my understanding in E...
First Clause = X developed prototype that is sitting below ocean.
Second Clause = It provides PQR.
Both the above clauses are joined by conjunctor And...is it because "it" can refer to prototype as well as surface both...so no clear referent ....
===============================================
In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal conditions for the mollusks’ growth.
A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides
goelmohit2002 wrote:IMO here the parallelism issue is not there.....rajanyadav wrote: Look closely at E. "that is sitting" and "it provides" is not parallel. Also sits is preferred to is sitting. I believe it has to do with active voice.
In comparison to E, D has - sits below and provides- parallel voice
since they are two independent clauses joined by conjunction "and"....parallelism comes in a single independent sentence....
Please tell what I am missing here ?
You are right. But there are several examples in OG where answer is choosen between two or may be among three options solely on basis of parallelism. So, here, D is preferable because of parallelism than option E.goelmohit2002 wrote:Yes I agree with you...madhur_ahuja wrote:I disagree. Parallelism can come into effect whenever there is conjunction and. It does not matter if they are independent clauses . The clauses can be made parallel as well.
Clauses "can" be made parallel...but they necessarily are not required to be made so....
i.e. if they are not parallel, then it does not mean that we can kick out simply because they are not parallel...for e.g. the case in E....it seems there is some other issue(atleast to me it looks so)
Please tell if I am misinterpreting you....or there is something that I am missing...
though not an expert yet trying to answer......goelmohit2002 wrote:Experts kindly share your opinion on this please !!!goelmohit2002 wrote:Hi All,
In the below question OA is D. Can someone please tell what is the problem with E ?
As per my understanding in E...
First Clause = X developed prototype that is sitting below ocean.
Second Clause = It provides PQR.
Both the above clauses are joined by conjunctor And...is it because "it" can refer to prototype as well as surface both...so no clear referent ....
===============================================
In an attempt to produce premium oysters, a firm in Scotland has developed a prototype of a submersible oyster farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides ideal conditions for the mollusks’ growth.
A. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean, and it provides
B. farm, sitting below the surface of the ocean for providing
C. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and providing
D. farm that sits below the surface of the ocean and provides
E. farm that is sitting below the surface of the ocean and it provides