BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Greeks

Expert replies
by gmatmachoman » Sun Jan 31, 2010 3:47 am
. Greek tragedy, one of the enduring pillars of our belief system, dramatized the concept that the misfortune a person suffers is not an accident, but rather a logical outcome of flaws in that person's nature; the misfortune is thus that person's "fault." Nonetheless, today the public broadly supports bankruptcy protection, family welfare and other "social safety net" programs that shield the destitute in the face of their hardships, at taxpayer expense.

Which of the following, if true, would best resolve the paradox in the statements above?

"¢ The ancient Greeks had few, if any, such social safety net programs in their
society.

"¢ The majority of the public is more familiar with the works of Shakespeare
than those of Greek tragedy.

"¢ Some people insist that society, not the individual, is to blame for most
accidents.

"¢ Many people in financial difficulties feel too ashamed to declare bankruptcy
or to take advantage of other social safety net programs.

"¢ The religions practiced by most people today strongly encourage people to
contribute to charities that assist innocent people injured in natural disasters,
such as hurricanes.

OA and explanation will follow ...
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:10 am
would go with C. explains another school of thought-which holds the society responsible for the misfortunes and therefore the support for safety net programs.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:19 am
This is a funny question, the paradox is a school of thought in the past contrasted with what is practiced in the present.

I think A resolves it by contrasting past with past saying, the school of thought was indeed followed by greeks

IMO A
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by fibbonnaci » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:57 pm
whats the paradox involved?

Before, ie in ancient times misfortunes were considered people's fault but today people support other's misfortunes sometimes at the expense of their money.

Why does this paradox occur? the answer that you select must explain both sides of the paradox. giving a valid reason for just one side of the paradox does not resolve it.

A) The ancient Greeks had few, if any, such social safety net programs in their society. [ this explains only one side of the paradox.If the greeks believed in these programs they would have established them long time back. the non existence of such programs shows that they didnt believe in these programs. this by no way explains why such a drastic shift occured in the society. Eliminated!]

B) The majority of the public is more familiar with the works of Shakespeare than those of Greek tragedy. [ works of shakespeare has got nothing to do with the stimulus. Eliminated!]

C) Some people insist that society, not the individual, is to blame for most accidents. [ does this answer why there has been a shift? some people implies atleast 1. lets say one person feels that society is to be blamed for accidents. will what one person think resolve the paradox?? Eliminated!]

D) Many people in financial difficulties feel too ashamed to declare bankruptcy or to take advantage of other social safety net programs. [ if they dont avail such programs then how come these programs reach out? how does that tell why the shift occured from ancient greek- person at fault kinda thinking to the present one? Eliminated!]

E) The religions practiced by most people today strongly encourage people to contribute to charities that assist innocent people injured in natural disasters, such as hurricanes. [Bingo! this explains the reason for the shift. down the line, religions encourage people to reach out and hence they do. My answer]

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion