BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Greatwater County painted edge markings

Expert replies
by jain2016 » Tue May 17, 2016 9:56 am
Many small roads do not have painted markings along their edges. Clear edge markings would make it easier for drivers to see upcoming curves and to judge the car's position on the road, particularly when visibility is poor, and would therefore seem to be a useful contribution to road safety. However, after Greatwater County painted edge markings on all its narrow, winding roads, the annual accident rate along those roads actually increased slightly.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in accident rate?

A) Greatwater County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.

B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.

C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater county's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.

D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.

E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so.

OAE

Hi Experts ,

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Tue May 17, 2016 10:15 am
jain2016 wrote:Many small roads do not have painted markings along their edges. Clear edge markings would make it easier for drivers to see upcoming curves and to judge the car's position on the road, particularly when visibility is poor, and would therefore seem to be a useful contribution to road safety. However, after Greatwater County painted edge markings on all its narrow, winding roads, the annual accident rate along those roads actually increased slightly.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in accident rate?

A) Greatwater County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.

B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.

C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater county's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.

D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.

E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so.

OAE

Hi Experts ,

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
We're trying to resolve the following paradox: after Greatwater County painted edge markings on its winding roads to improve safety, the accident rate actually went up. Well imagine you're a driver and you hear about this windy road with a reputation for being dangerous. It's likely that you'd avoid it, right? But if the town did something to improve the safety of this road, you'd be less likely to avoid it. Well, you can't get into an accident on a road that you don't drive on! So once you decide that the road is safe enough to use, you increase the likelihood that you'll be involved in an accident there. This is the idea captured in E. The roads may well be safer with the markings, but if more people are traveling on these roads, the likelihood of accidents can still go up.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by OptimusPrep » Thu May 19, 2016 3:50 am
Roads do not have markings on edges.
Markings enhance judgement in poor visibility conditions.
Hence accidents should decrease.
In Greatweather, the markings have actually increased the accident rate.

What can be the possible causes of accidents?
1. The drivers have become careless
2. The markings are reflecting at night
3. The traffic has increased. etc.

Of the given options, Option E resonates with our point 3.

Correct Option: E
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:48 am
DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:
jain2016 wrote:Many small roads do not have painted markings along their edges. Clear edge markings would make it easier for drivers to see upcoming curves and to judge the car's position on the road, particularly when visibility is poor, and would therefore seem to be a useful contribution to road safety. However, after Greatwater County painted edge markings on all its narrow, winding roads, the annual accident rate along those roads actually increased slightly.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the increase in accident rate?

A) Greatwater County has an unusually high proportion of narrow, winding roads.

B) In bad weather it can be nearly as difficult for drivers to see the road as it is at night.

C) Prior to the painting of the edge markings, Greatwater county's narrow, winding roads already had a somewhat higher accident rate than other Greatwater County roads.

D) Many of the accidents on narrow, winding roads involve a single vehicle veering off the road, rather than the collision of two vehicles.

E) After the markings were painted on the roads, many drivers who had gone out of their way to avoid driving on those roads at night no longer did so.

OAE

Hi Experts ,

Please explain.

Many thanks in advance.

SJ
We're trying to resolve the following paradox: after Greatwater County painted edge markings on its winding roads to improve safety, the accident rate actually went up. Well imagine you're a driver and you hear about this windy road with a reputation for being dangerous. It's likely that you'd avoid it, right? But if the town did something to improve the safety of this road, you'd be less likely to avoid it. Well, you can't get into an accident on a road that you don't drive on! So once you decide that the road is safe enough to use, you increase the likelihood that you'll be involved in an accident there. This is the idea captured in E. The roads may well be safer with the markings, but if more people are traveling on these roads, the likelihood of accidents can still go up.
Hi Dave,
Would require some clarity on the term "accident rate" here.

I guess, it's something like this --> equals to either total # of accidents/total # of cars or total # of accidents/total # of miles traveled. Right ?

So, how option E fits in here ? Can you please help ?
Join the discussion

by RBBmba@2014 » Wed May 16, 2018 11:07 am
Hi Dave,
Any update on my above concern ?

Look forward to hear from you. Much thanks in advance!
Join the discussion