BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Grape, Celery, Chili pepper...

Expert replies
by scorpionz » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:08 pm
Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.


A. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

D. In the 1880s, pests destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region and more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.

E. In the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry from what was destroying grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region.


Please post answers with explanations.

Source: MGMAT

OA - B..
Last edited by scorpionz on Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sat Sep 11, 2010 10:25 pm
imo A
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:36 pm
IMO C.

A - 1. word crops is misplaced. It should be after walnut.
2. Altered intent - The statement suggests that more effective pest control methods saved the citrus industry in the 1880s. The intended meaning is that newer pest control methods introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

B - Altered intent - The statement suggests that more effective pest control methods saved the citrus industry in the 1880s. The intended meaning is that newer pest control methods introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.

C - Correct

D - 1. use of and is incorrect - A contrast is being shown, so but is the right conjunction.

E - 1. was destroying is incorrect tense here - had destroyed would have been better here.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:00 am
Has to be B...
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:02 am
adi_800 wrote:Has to be B...
Let's not just shout out answer without providing any type of evidence or thought...It just doesn't help the discussion at all.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by GMAT Hacker » Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:53 am
uwhusky wrote:
adi_800 wrote:Has to be B...
Let's not just shout out answer without providing any type of evidence or thought...It just doesn't help the discussion at all.

Both B and C is grammetically correct. But it has to do with meaning clarity. Choice C changes the meaning of the sentence. In choice C, 'that' refers to method, which is problematic. According to C, which says method used in 1880's saved the citrus industry. But we really don't know if citrus industry saved in 1880 or later.

But, choice B maintain intended original meaning. Hence QA B
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Sun Sep 12, 2010 2:13 am
I'll just copy and paste the link with discussion already in place.

https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/vie ... &view=next
Yep.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1