Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GRANT Research Institute publication

Expert replies
by psm12se » Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:03 am
The GRANT Research Institute recently published a report saying that legalizing the illegal drug dullnic in the state of Fruitland would not substantially decrease the revenue or operations of illegal drug traffickers. In the report, GRANT stated that even though legal dullnic would be of a higher quality and lower cost than illegal dullnic, sales of dullnic within Fruitland accounted for a small percentage of overall dullnic sales. Proponents of dullnic legalization point out that the GRANT Institute’s logic is flawed because it fails to take into account that


A. Legally grown dullnic in Fruitland will be sold in other states in the region.

B. Once dullnic is legalized, people will try to legalize other drugs that are currently illegally trafficked.

C.Other research institutes have also studied this issue and come to different conclusions.

D. If it becomes legal to grow dullnic, people will stop buying dullnic from dealers.

E. Illegal drug traffickers will be able to legally grow dullnic within Fruitland’s borders.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by tisrar02 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:03 pm
IMO- E-> If the cost is lower and the drug is legal, those dealers will grow in state for cheaper and thus not substantially decrease rev from dealers.

A- Other states doesn't matter, were talking about the dealers
B- Other drugs, not relevant
C- Not relevant
D- We can not conclude that other people will STOP buying from dealers

OA and Source????
Dedication is what leads to success...
Join the discussion

by himu » Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:44 pm
+ 1 for E for same reason mentioned above.
OA & course pls ?
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 7:43 pm
my take would be B
we need a reason as why GRANT Institute’s logic is flawed .the conclusion of grant institute is : that that legalizing the illegal drug dullnic in the state of Fruitland would not substantially decrease the revenue or operations of illegal drug traffickers .it never says revenue and operation of illegal drug traffickers of dullnic .so if we cite a reason that doing something with this one drug will motivate people to try to legalize other drugs then the overall revenue an operations of illegal drugs will be affected .this is what B does
Join the discussion

by aditya8062 » Sat Feb 23, 2013 11:38 pm
plz share the OA
Join the discussion

by Tommy Wallach » Sun Feb 24, 2013 12:18 pm
Hey Guys,

This seems like a pretty weird question, but (E) does win.

Conclusion: Legalizing dullnic will not hurt revenues of illegal drug folks
Premise: Sales of dullnic within Fruitland are small amount of sales

(A) seems plausible. GRANT concludes that even if the legal replaces the illegal, it doesn't matter, because Fruitland is small. But if that dullnic is sold elsewhere, it could hurt the revenues of illegal drug folks all over the place. However, we don't know if dullnic is already legal in other places, so we still wouldn't be hurting other illegal drug folks.

(B) "Trying" doesn't matter. If they succeeded, that might hurt drug dealers revenues, but we don't know that.

(C) This is silly, as we don't even know what the other conclusions are!

(D) This might be tempting, but it would still only affect Fruitland, which is a small part of sales.

(E) If illegal drug traffickers from other places can start growing it legally in Fruitland, then it could hurt overall sales of illegal dullnic.

Not a great question to my mind. Where's it from?

-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT

If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
Join the discussion

by psm12se » Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:19 am
Source: Grockit
Answer : E
Join the discussion

by Soumita Ghosh » Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:14 pm
Hey Tommy

I choose A. It never came in my mind that E can be answer!!

As for option A we are saying that we do not know whether dullnic is already legal in other places, so we still wouldn't be hurting other illegal drug folks. Same as for option E also we can say that we do not know whether dullnic is already legal in other places, so we still wouldn't be hurting other illegal drug folks .

Can you give anymore good reason to eliminate A and keep E.?

Thanks a lot !! :)
Join the discussion