Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GPREP SC- 11

Expert replies
by abhasjha » Sat Aug 16, 2014 6:25 pm
Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power,while in Germany it is just over 33%.

A) while in Germany it is just over 33%

B) compared to Germany, which uses just over 33%

C) whereas nuclear poweraccounts for just over 33% of the energy produced in Germany

D) whereas just over 33% of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

E) compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just over 33%
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:03 am
abhasjha wrote:Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power,while in Germany it is just over 33%.

A) while in Germany it is just over 33%

B) compared to Germany, which uses just over 33%

C) whereas nuclear poweraccounts for just over 33% of the energy produced in Germany

D) whereas just over 33% of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

E) compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just over 33%
In A and E, it lacks a clear referent.
Eliminate A and E.

B: Germany, which uses just over 33% [of the energy produced in France]
Since the first clause of the sentence discusses 75% of the energy produced in France, 33% seems to imply 33% of the energy produced in France.
The result is the following meaning:
Germany uses just over 33% of THE ENERGY PRODUCED IN FRANCE.
Not the intended meaning.
Eliminate B.

D: 33% of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany
Here, the energy seems to refers to the energy produced in France, the type of energy discussed in the preceding clause.
The result is the following meaning:
33% of THE ENERGY PRODUCED IN FRANCE comes from nuclear power in Germany.
Not the intended meaning.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aflaam » Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:04 am
hello Mitch,
Is faulty comparison in B and E also an error?
comma verbed applies to preceding noun...?
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 03, 2016 4:14 am
aflaam wrote:hello Mitch,
Is faulty comparison in B and E also an error?
comma verbed applies to preceding noun...?
Good work.
Generally, COMMA + VERBed serves to modify the nearest preceding noun.

B: nuclear power, compared to Germany
Here, nuclear power is illogically compared to Germany.
Eliminate B.

E: nuclear power, compared with the energy
Here, nuclear power is illogically compared with the energy.
Eliminate E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by aflaam » Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:41 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
aflaam wrote:hello Mitch,
Is faulty comparison in B and E also an error?
comma verbed applies to preceding noun...?
Good work.
Appreciation from the Emperor of GMAT and i am on the top of the world. :)
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Thu Feb 04, 2016 7:18 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
abhasjha wrote:Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power,while in Germany it is just over 33%.

A) while in Germany it is just over 33%

B) compared to Germany, which uses just over 33%

C) whereas nuclear poweraccounts for just over 33% of the energy produced in Germany

D) whereas just over 33% of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

E) compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just over 33%
In A and E, it lacks a clear referent.
Eliminate A and E.

B: Germany, which uses just over 33% [of the energy produced in France]
Since the first clause of the sentence discusses 75% of the energy produced in France, 33% seems to imply 33% of the energy produced in France.
The result is the following meaning:
Germany uses just over 33% of THE ENERGY PRODUCED IN FRANCE.
Not the intended meaning.
Eliminate B.

D: 33% of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany
Here, the energy seems to refers to the energy produced in France, the type of energy discussed in the preceding clause.
The result is the following meaning:
33% of THE ENERGY PRODUCED IN FRANCE comes from nuclear power in Germany.
Not the intended meaning.

The correct answer is C.
Hi Guru,

How 'it' lacks referent? i think it is clearly refers to 'energy'.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Feb 04, 2016 4:39 pm
Mo2men wrote:
Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, while in Germany it is just over 33%.

A) while in Germany it is just over 33%

B) compared to Germany, which uses just over 33%

C) whereas nuclear poweraccounts for just over 33% of the energy produced in Germany

D) whereas just over 33% of the energy comes from nuclear power in Germany

E) compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just over 33%
Hi Guru,

How 'it' lacks referent? i think it is clearly refers to 'energy'.
The referent for a subject pronoun such as it must include not only the antecedent noun but also ANY ATTACHED MODIFIERS.

A: Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, while in Germany it is just over 33%.
Here, it (subject pronoun) seems to refer to over 75% of the energy produced in France (the preceding subject and its attached modifiers).
Conveyed meaning:
Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, while in Germany over 75% of the energy produced in France is just over 33%.
The conveyed meaning is nonsensical.
Eliminate A.

E: Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is just over 33%.
Here, it seems to refer either to over 75% of the energy produced in France (the preceding subject and its attached modifier) or to the energy from nuclear power in Germany (the nearest preceding noun and its attached modifiers).
Possible conveyed meanings:
Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where over 75% of the energy produced in France is just over 33%.
Over 75% of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where the energy from nuclear power in Germany is just over 33%.
Neither meaning is sensical.
Eliminate E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion