BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GPREP Range Question

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 10:58 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 2 times
by zagcollins » Mon Jul 28, 2008 2:53 am
For the students in class A, the range of their height is r cm and greatest height is g cm. In class B, the range of heights is s cm and greatest height is h cm. Is the least height of students in class A greater than least height of students in class B?

1)r<s
2)g>h

OA is C.
Last edited by zagcollins on Tue Jul 29, 2008 4:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:01 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 7 times

by augusto » Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:42 am
The answer is C.

From (1) you know that Range(A) is < Range(B), which is not sufficient.

From (2) you know that Tallest(A) is > Tallest(B), which is not sufficient.

from (1) and (2) you know that Range(A) < Range(B), and also that Tallest(A) > Tallest(B).
We can infer
Smallest(A) = Tallest(A) - Range(A)
Smallest(B) = Tallest(B) - Range(B)

with that you can conclude that Smallest(A) > Smallest(B).


I know that I'm not very clear... sorry about it, I really don't know how to explain this problem.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:47 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 5 times

by ricky » Mon Jul 28, 2008 9:46 am
IMO C as well.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:30 pm
A:
Range : r
greatest: g

r = g - lowest a

B:
range: s
greatest: h

s = h - lowest b

Q: Is lowest a > lowest b

(or) g-r > h-s

Stmt I

r<s

INSUFF since g can be that much greater than h to compensate for r being lower than s

Stmt II

g>h

INSUFF since s can be that much smaller than r to compensate for g being greater than h

Stmt I and II together
r<s
g>h

g-r > h-s

SUFF

Choose C)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1