BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GPrep Critical Reasoning with Automation

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
Expert replies
by gkumar » Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:37 pm
Please provide explanation for your answers to the below TWO critical reasoning questions (no IMOs!). OAs will be provided.

In many corporations, employees are being replaced by automated equipment in order to save money. However,many workers who lose their jobs to automation will need government assistance to survive, and the same corporations that are laying people off will eventually pay for that assistance through increased taxes and unemployment insurance payments.

The author is arguing that

(A) higher taxes and unemployment insurance payments will discourage corporations from automating

(B) replacing people through automation to reduce production costs will result in increases of other costs to corporations.

(C) many workers who lose their jobs to automation will have to be retrained for new jobs

(D) corporations that are laying people off will eventually rehire many of them

(E) corporations will not save money by automating because people will be needed to run the new machines


Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the author's argument?

(A) Many workers who have already lost their jobs to automation have been unable to find new jobs.

(B) Many corporations that have failed to automate have seen their profits decline.

(C) Taxes and unemployment insurance are paid also by corporations that are not automating.

(D) Most of the new jobs created by automation pay less than the jobs eliminated by automation did.

(E) The initial investment in machinery for automation is often greater than the short-term savings in labor costs.
Join the discussion
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |

by kiennguyen » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:06 am
B & B( I'm confused)
Join the discussion

by akhilkathuria » Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:29 am
1. B.

It restates the fact which author is saying in the passage. If you fire people, those people have to be supported by govt by increase in taxes. So companies save money by firing loose by paying taxes

2. A

because the only way government have to help those fired people is if they dont earn, so no job, no money hence answer A
Join the discussion

by gkumar » Thu Oct 22, 2009 4:31 am
OA is B and A!

kiennguyen , can you describe your process of elimination and clarify why the OA is A and not E is the correct answer?
Join the discussion

yes sir!

by kiennguyen » Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:52 pm
after re-approaching this question, I have some opinions:
1) A. may or may not happen ( since the passage does not provide enough information such a specific company with its balance between the saving of labor cost and the increase of taxes and other fees, we can not say "yes" or "no")
B. yes. It is mentioned in the last sentence.
C. not mentioned.
D. irrelevant.
E. this contradicts with the argument.

2) in this question, I'm confused between A&B. however, A is the better.
_the premise: fired workers need money, then government gives them money. Money comes from higher taxes and payments which the same corporations have to pay. therefore:
A. support the argument. if fired workers haven't been employed, government would still have to give them money. corporations...therefore, it may not a good idea to automation.
B. weaken the argument.
C. weaken the argument.
D. not enough information to weaken or strengthen the argument.
E. this presents the comparison between The initial investments in machinery for automation and the short-term savings in labor costs. however, when a company invests in equipments, it targets the long term operation. therefore, this question would be an answer if it makes a comparison between the long term savings, such as in a 15-year operation, in machinery and that in labor costs.

tell me if not clear!
Join the discussion

It is

by enniguy » Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:49 am
B & C.

1.
Note that this question is asking for "Assumption".
Observe the words in the question ...in order to save money...will eventually pay...
Hence the author is arguing the corporations will eventually spend money as option B mentions.
What are other costs? Taxes paid to govt. to assist laid off employees under "Unemployment maintenance schemes" (Just an example).

2. This is a more challenging question. This question can easily be understood if you can spot the assumption in the argument (Which is the answer to Question 1). This answer is a restatement of the conclusion
Join the discussion