BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Good CR question

Expert replies
by thestartupguy » Sat Nov 12, 2011 8:59 am
Although fullerenes - spherical molecules made entirely of carbon - were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermine the argument?

a) Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation

b) Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft

c) The mineral shungnite itself contains large amount of carbon, from which fullerenes apparently formed

d) The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure

e) Shungite itself is only formed under distinctive conditions


OA after some explanations
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:38 am
IMO B

Because only the above provides alternative explanation.
Join the discussion

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:40 am
IMO B

Because only the above option provides possible alternative explanation about the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:40 am
IMO B

Because only the above option provides possible alternative explanation about the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:44 am
IMO B

Because only the above option provides possible alternative explanation about the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by mir.yahya » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:44 am
IMO B

Because only the above option provides possible alternative explanation about the conclusion.
Join the discussion

by ArunangsuSahu » Sat Nov 12, 2011 5:26 pm
(B)
Join the discussion

by k.pankaj.r » Sun Nov 13, 2011 7:45 am
IMO B
as none the other arguments presented a case where the hypothesis state above could be weakened by proving that fullerenes do not exist naturally and can only be manufactured in lab
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:13 pm
(B) is not good because if F contain in meteorite, we can determine the condition of Earth' crust at that time :D.

IMO D
Join the discussion