BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Good CR question

Expert replies
by hey_thr67 » Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:28 am
170. The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?

(A) Studies have shown that an increase in a city's police force does not necessarily reduce crime.

(B) When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year, there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.

(C) If funding for the new police officers' salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.

(D) In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.

(E) Middletown's ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Birottam Dutta » Sun Jun 03, 2012 8:00 am
This question has been up on this forum before as well. I think you should ask the site managers of a way to first search if a question is already posted, and if not, then maybe we can discuss it.

However, for your sake, the answer is E!

E says that increasing the police will have a deterring effect on the crime scene so the conclusion drawn that there will not be enough money to fund additional judges etc for additional cases will be invalidated.

Hope this answers your question!
Join the discussion

by confuse mind » Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:30 pm
IMO - D

E looks tempting but I do not agree with it since the societal good, i.e., reduction in crime or so in not a part of the conclusion or something on which conclusion is based. The conclusion is based on the prison and court services.
Join the discussion

by ankita1709 » Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:10 pm
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:07 am
E .

prephrase the argument: we should not hire more police personnels because this would mean more arrests and that would lead to more prisoners, more prison employees, leading to more expenditure . And we have no money with us.

Now look at option E. Hire police personnel and the crime will reduce. Less crime, less prisoners, less money spent. So hiring police is good.

Hope this helps!
Join the discussion