BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Good assumption question

Expert replies
by thestartupguy » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:04 am
The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the bloodstream, the better a person's lung function, as measured by the amount of air the person can expel in one second. The lung function of smokers is significantly worse, on average, than that of nonsmokers. Clearly, therefore, one way for smokers to improve their lung function is for them to increase their intake of foods that are rich in these helpful vitamins and minerals.

Which of the following is an assumption on which this argument depends?

A. Smokers are less likely than nonsmokers to have diets that are rich in vitamins and minerals.
B. The lung function of smokers whose diets are rich in those vitamins and minerals is generally better than that of
nonsmokers with comparable diets.
C. People whose diets are deficient in those vitamins and minerals do not typically have other health problems in
addition to diminished lung function.
D. Stopping smoking will not typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can.
E. Smoking does not introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ArunangsuSahu » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:56 pm
(C)
Join the discussion

by balram » Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:10 pm
(E)
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Sat Nov 12, 2011 2:44 pm
IMO E
A. Smokers are less likely than nonsmokers to have diets that are rich in vitamins and minerals. (weakening the conclusion)
B. The lung function of smokers whose diets are rich in those vitamins and minerals is generally better than that of nonsmokers with comparable diets. (Distortion of details- argument does n't support this answer)
C. People whose diets are deficient in those vitamins and minerals do not typically have other health problems in addition to diminished lung function. (over generalization- we are only concerned about smokers)
D. Stopping smoking will not typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can. (two actions are not compared in the argument)
E. Smoking does not introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.(An example of Defender type answer.)

Let's apply negation test on E : Smoking introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.

If above were true , by increasing the intake of vitamins, smokers would not improve their lung function.
As negation weakens the conclusion, E must be true.
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

by k.pankaj.r » Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:01 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by vaibhavgupta » Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:14 am
+1 for E

POE . Only statement capable of negating the conclusion!

Looking for OA! :)
If OA is A, IMO B
If OA is B, IMO C
If OA is C, IMO D
If OA is D, IMO E
If OA is E, IMO A

FML!! :/
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:05 pm
After eliminating, my remain choices are D and E. I choose E.

Let's negate them

D. Stopping smoking will typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can. => Ok, now smoking can improve lung function. The smoker can combine eating healthy food as well as stop smoking. Not weaken. Right?

E. Smoking introduces into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream. => If smoking can prevent helpful vitamins and minerals, smokers' eating healthy food is ineffective. Weaken. This is a assumption.
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:09 pm
OA E
Join the discussion