BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Good assumption question

Expert replies
by thestartupguy » Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:04 am
The higher the level of certain vitamins and minerals in the bloodstream, the better a person's lung function, as measured by the amount of air the person can expel in one second. The lung function of smokers is significantly worse, on average, than that of nonsmokers. Clearly, therefore, one way for smokers to improve their lung function is for them to increase their intake of foods that are rich in these helpful vitamins and minerals.

Which of the following is an assumption on which this argument depends?

A. Smokers are less likely than nonsmokers to have diets that are rich in vitamins and minerals.
B. The lung function of smokers whose diets are rich in those vitamins and minerals is generally better than that of
nonsmokers with comparable diets.
C. People whose diets are deficient in those vitamins and minerals do not typically have other health problems in
addition to diminished lung function.
D. Stopping smoking will not typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can.
E. Smoking does not introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ArunangsuSahu » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:56 pm
(C)
Join the discussion

by balram » Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:10 pm
(E)
Join the discussion

by smackmartine » Sat Nov 12, 2011 2:44 pm
IMO E
A. Smokers are less likely than nonsmokers to have diets that are rich in vitamins and minerals. (weakening the conclusion)
B. The lung function of smokers whose diets are rich in those vitamins and minerals is generally better than that of nonsmokers with comparable diets. (Distortion of details- argument does n't support this answer)
C. People whose diets are deficient in those vitamins and minerals do not typically have other health problems in addition to diminished lung function. (over generalization- we are only concerned about smokers)
D. Stopping smoking will not typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can. (two actions are not compared in the argument)
E. Smoking does not introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.(An example of Defender type answer.)

Let's apply negation test on E : Smoking introduce into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream.

If above were true , by increasing the intake of vitamins, smokers would not improve their lung function.
As negation weakens the conclusion, E must be true.
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Join the discussion

by k.pankaj.r » Sun Nov 13, 2011 8:01 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by vaibhavgupta » Sun Nov 13, 2011 9:14 am
+1 for E

POE . Only statement capable of negating the conclusion!

Looking for OA! :)
If OA is A, IMO B
If OA is B, IMO C
If OA is C, IMO D
If OA is D, IMO E
If OA is E, IMO A

FML!! :/
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Sun Nov 13, 2011 5:05 pm
After eliminating, my remain choices are D and E. I choose E.

Let's negate them

D. Stopping smoking will typically improve lung function more than any diet changes can. => Ok, now smoking can improve lung function. The smoker can combine eating healthy food as well as stop smoking. Not weaken. Right?

E. Smoking introduces into the body chemicals that prevent the helpful vitamins and minerals from entering the bloodstream. => If smoking can prevent helpful vitamins and minerals, smokers' eating healthy food is ineffective. Weaken. This is a assumption.
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Mon Nov 14, 2011 8:09 pm
OA E
Join the discussion