BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gold Mining

Expert replies
by yangliu0401 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:52 am
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nitya34 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:16 am
IMO E makes sense
can anyone explain using Negation pls
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:12 am
IMO D

Negate the assumption: Frobisher had soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content. If this is true then the method of determinig gold content may be correct, in that case the conclusion " method of determining gold content must have been inaccurate" is weakened.
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by yangliu0401 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:39 am
I think both D&E are Ok. While I can not figure out which is better. Can anyone state?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:54 am
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.


Negate we get : Frobisher did have soil samples from other Canadian island examined for gold content. Ok so what. This does not wekan the conclusion that Frobisher’s methods for examining samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island must have been inaccurate


E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined

CORRECT

Negate this

Gold was added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. This would mean that Frobisher’s methods used to determine the gold content of his samples must have been accurate (had gold coentent) and hence the conclusion is weakened.

This must be an assumption for the argument to stand.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by yangliu0401 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:08 pm
cramya wrote:D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.


Negate we get : Frobisher did have soil samples from other Canadian island examined for gold content. Ok so what. This does not wekan the conclusion that Frobisher’s methods for examining samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island must have been inaccurate


E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined

CORRECT

Negate this

Gold was added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. This would mean that Frobisher’s methods used to determine the gold content of his samples must have been accurate (had gold coentent) and hence the conclusion is weakened.

This must be an assumption for the argument to stand.

Regards,
CR
I see. Thx alot! :)
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:15 am
Yea agree with Cramya, option E makes more sense.

Thanks
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:47 am
E seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion