BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gold Mining

Expert replies
by yangliu0401 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:52 am
Frobisher, a sixteenth-century English explorer, had soil samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island examined for gold content. Because high gold content was reported, Elizabeth I funded two mining expeditions. Neither expedition found any gold there. Modern analysis of the island’s soil indicates a very low gold content. Thus the methods used to determine the gold content of Frobisher’s samples must have been inaccurate.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The gold content of the soil on Kodlunarn Island is much lower today than it was in the sixteenth century.
B. The two mining expeditions funded by Elizabeth I did not mine the same part of Kodlunarn Island.
C. The methods used to assess gold content of the soil samples provided by Frobisher were different from those generally used in the sixteenth century.
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.
E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nitya34 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:16 am
IMO E makes sense
can anyone explain using Negation pls
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:12 am
IMO D

Negate the assumption: Frobisher had soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content. If this is true then the method of determinig gold content may be correct, in that case the conclusion " method of determining gold content must have been inaccurate" is weakened.
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by yangliu0401 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:39 am
I think both D&E are Ok. While I can not figure out which is better. Can anyone state?
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:54 am
D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.


Negate we get : Frobisher did have soil samples from other Canadian island examined for gold content. Ok so what. This does not wekan the conclusion that Frobisher’s methods for examining samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island must have been inaccurate


E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined

CORRECT

Negate this

Gold was added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. This would mean that Frobisher’s methods used to determine the gold content of his samples must have been accurate (had gold coentent) and hence the conclusion is weakened.

This must be an assumption for the argument to stand.

Regards,
CR
Join the discussion

by yangliu0401 » Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:08 pm
cramya wrote:D. Frobisher did not have soil samples from any other Canadian island examined for gold content.


Negate we get : Frobisher did have soil samples from other Canadian island examined for gold content. Ok so what. This does not wekan the conclusion that Frobisher’s methods for examining samples from Canada’s Kodlunarn Island must have been inaccurate


E. Gold was not added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined

CORRECT

Negate this

Gold was added to the soil samples collected by Frobisher before the samples were examined. This would mean that Frobisher’s methods used to determine the gold content of his samples must have been accurate (had gold coentent) and hence the conclusion is weakened.

This must be an assumption for the argument to stand.

Regards,
CR
I see. Thx alot! :)
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Sun Mar 01, 2009 8:15 am
Yea agree with Cramya, option E makes more sense.

Thanks
"Great works are performed not by strength but by perseverance."
Join the discussion

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:47 am
E seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion