BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmatprep2- 34

Expert replies
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

by kumarpaw » Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:45 pm
Answer C.
Below the highlighted text, the fact that in 1974-19997 real GDP per capita (g) grew 0.5% slower than it did during 1873-1973 may force us to believe that next few years g may be more slower...in further next few years it may become even more slower...and so on.... So there may be a one point in time in future when g becomes either constant or rather decrease !! resulting in g becoming lower than before (CONTRADICTING the premise or claim mentioned in the HIGHLIGHTED text).
So it is proved that the fact cited ( "One point these journalists....between 1873 and 1973.") in support of highlighted claim ("the real GDP...ever brfore.") does not support the claim. Hence C.
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:28 am
yeah agreed, saying something that is already known says nothing relevant. So C
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion