BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep - Voronia

Expert replies
by jsl » Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:11 am
OA is A.

What I don't understand is... the passage says the product's prices can't be raised and the usage of prescription drugs did not expand. Although new medications were produced, how can the spending increase if the same number of prescription drugs were used?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: GMATPrep - Voronia

by yezz » Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:37 pm
Per capita expenditure = total expenditure / population

these are the only 2 factors that matters

by illimination

2)......population increase thus according to the above formula per capita will decrease.........wrong
the rest of the answer choices has no effect on the above formula

then A is the best answer ( only the best answer not the most logical)
Join the discussion

by rohangupta83 » Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:38 pm
choice A says that new medicines are replacing old ones. So, the price of the new medicines could be more than the ones they are replacing.

That's the only way for the per capita expenditure to rise besides population dropping and expenditure keeping steady.
Join the discussion

by nervesofsteel » Mon Nov 03, 2008 1:47 pm
yes A should be the answer

as by replacing old prescribed drugs with new costly drugs a manufacturer can avoid raising prices and the expenditure will increase simultaneously
Join the discussion

by adilka » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:37 pm
Im going to bring this topic back from the dead.
I disagree with A because the question itself says:
"prohibited manufacturers from raising ANY of their product's fees"
Key word being ANY. To me, that means old and new. I understand that you'll say "new drug" prices weren't even set in the first place, which will eliminate the concept of "raising" prices. But I would assume that Voronian government means prohibiting price increase for drugs for a certain disease, not necessarily list them all by name. Otherwise the government is just stupid - companies can change the drug a little, call it something else and increase the price!

I personally picked C as the one most "suitable" since I thought higher margins mean lower worker wages, hence per capita expenditure would rise (drug costs are flat, wages DECLINING, hence, % spent on drugs increasing).

Am I thinking way too much into these problems?? :oops:
Join the discussion

by iwg770 » Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:52 am
A is proper.

prohibited manufacturers from raising ANY of their product's fees.

How can you increase the fee of a new product?
New product is New so it is launched first and then it fee can be increased. So if drug company decides the fee of its new product cosiderably high than existing fee, then expenditure will increase. Also, technicaly Drug company is not voilating the law as it is not increasing the fees, it is just introducing the new product.
Join the discussion

by adilka » Tue Dec 23, 2008 8:18 am
iwg770 wrote:A is proper.

prohibited manufacturers from raising ANY of their product's fees.

How can you increase the fee of a new product?
New product is New so it is launched first and then it fee can be increased. So if drug company decides the fee of its new product cosiderably high than existing fee, then expenditure will increase. Also, technicaly Drug company is not voilating the law as it is not increasing the fees, it is just introducing the new product.
That's why I said:
I understand that you'll say "new drug" prices weren't even set in the first place, which will eliminate the concept of "raising" prices. But I would assume that Voronian government means prohibiting price increase for drugs for a certain disease, not necessarily list them all by name. Otherwise the government is just stupid - companies can change the drug a little, call it something else and increase the price!
Anyway, not sure how much value there is to discussing this. It is what it is
Join the discussion

by samanthaJ79 » Fri May 13, 2016 3:17 am
A looks good for me
Join the discussion