BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep

Expert replies
by GMATMadeEasy » Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:18 am
After decreasing steadily in the mid-1990's, the percentage of students in the United States finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and 84.8 percent in 1998.

(A) finishing high school or having earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, up to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(B) finishing high school or earning equivalency diplomas, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rising to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(C) having finished high school or earning an equivalency diploma increased in the last three years of the decade, and rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and from
(D) who either finished high school or they earned an equivalency diploma, increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and


OA is E .

Could someone explain A and C please, why they are wrong. ALl reasons please.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by shovan85 » Thu Sep 30, 2010 9:46 am
(A) finishing modifies United States
(B) increase and rise redundant
(C) increase and rise redundant
(D) either X or Y... X and Y not parallel
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-23 ... 66575.html
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Thu Sep 30, 2010 11:16 pm
shovan85 wrote:(A) finishing modifies United States
(B) increase and rise redundant
(C) increase and rise redundant
(D) either X or Y... X and Y not parallel
(E) who finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas increased in the last three years of the decade, to 86.5 percent in 2000 from 85.9 percent in 1999 and
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.beatthegmat.com/gmat-prep-23 ... 66575.html
A has Verb+ing modifier error. "finishing" modifies US instead the "students".

To cross check, try remove the prepositional phrase "i n the United States ", now finishing modifies to students.

E: {relative pronoun & parallelism & idiom, parallelism }

{who, & finished high school or earned equivalency diplomas & from ..to, in 1999 and in 1998. }

All things are rightly and properly used.
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:27 am
1. NOUN + Verbing:
The verbing without comma modifies the NOUN immediately before the verbing.

Example
I know the boy working in the factory.

This sentence has two meaning:
1. I know the boy who is working in the factory.
2. I know the boy while I was working in the factory.
This kills A, B , and C

2. Either X or Y-X and Y MUST be grammatically parallel.
This kills D.

Answer is E.
Join the discussion

by frank1 » Sat Oct 02, 2010 12:37 am
shovan85 wrote: (D) either X or Y... X and Y not parallel
I was able to get down to E as other seems bad...
runner up was D
but that was not reason i crossed D....infact it seems to follow either x or Y pattern to distract things...

Problems were
either finished high school or they earned an equivalency ......use of they which adds ambuity
and increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to
increasing and rose give same meaning ...dont need both
so easy kill eventually..
GMAT score is equally counted as your GPA and 78 clicks can change you life.
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:58 am
frank1 wrote:
shovan85 wrote: (D) either X or Y... X and Y not parallel
I was able to get down to E as other seems bad...
runner up was D
but that was not reason i crossed D....infact it seems to follow either x or Y pattern to distract things...

Problems were
either finished high school or they earned an equivalency ......use of they which adds ambuity
and increasing in the last three years of the decade, rose to
increasing and rose give same meaning ...dont need both
so easy kill eventually..
Whatever is the reason if you remove the either finished high school or from D you can clearly see the redundancy who they thus X and Y are not parallel
Join the discussion

by chandan_lnct » Fri Jul 15, 2011 5:28 am
gmat_perfect wrote:1. NOUN + Verbing:
The verbing without comma modifies the NOUN immediately before the verbing.

Example
I know the boy working in the factory.

This sentence has two meaning:
1. I know the boy who is working in the factory.
2. I know the boy while I was working in the factory.
This kills A, B , and C

2. Either X or Y-X and Y MUST be grammatically parallel.
This kills D.

Answer is E.

could you please explain why D is out
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1