BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPREP SC

Expert replies
by rakeshd347 » Tue Oct 15, 2013 11:04 pm
Please explain your answers.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by vinay1983 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:23 am
Whoa!Is the marked option correct?Strange, I think we need "towards". We can come down to options by POE, C and E.

C seems very awkward.

E for me
You can, for example never foretell what any one man will do, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to!
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:31 am
Very confusing SC :(..

But felt [spoiler]{D}[/spoiler] is the best & cleara
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by rakeshd347 » Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:59 am
D is the correct answer but why is C wrong.
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:23 am
{C} - INCORRECT; I would prefer "compared with" instead of "compared to" here; the usage of "previously" seems awkward;
{D} - CORRECT; better answer choice than {C}
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by mevicks » Thu Oct 17, 2013 2:36 am
rakeshd347 wrote:Please explain your answers.
Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

A) year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
The students (and not higher education was) were previously paying $7 dollars per year; previously is incorrectly modifying higher education. A is out.
B) year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year
for which was -> the meaning distorts. what was "paid"? higher education was paid ?. B is out
C) year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
Incorrect usage of an adverb. Previously requires a verb/adjective/adverb; the previously $7 per year --> should be the previous $7 per year.
D) year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously
Correct Answer. Maintains parallelism. X per year [towards something] instead of Y per year.
E) year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education
The placement of "for the cost of higher education" is wrong. Just $7 dollars per year required for the cost of higher education! Sweet! :)

Answer D
Join the discussion

by mevicks » Thu Oct 17, 2013 2:41 am
vinay1983 wrote:Whoa!Is the marked option correct?Strange, I think we need "towards". We can come down to options by POE, C and E.

C seems very awkward.

E for me
Vinay I had the exact same doubt but ignored it and took it for granted;
checked the dictionary and it says this :
Image
In American English it seems toward is correct!
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Thu Oct 17, 2013 3:48 am
Yep, both forms are correct.. it's just that we, non-natives, are used to "towards" :)
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Oct 17, 2013 6:48 am
Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per
year
C. year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required
previously
E. year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher
education
A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to express CONTEMPORANEOUS action: an action attributed to the preceding subject and happening AT THE SAME TIME as -- and often as a result of -- the preceding action.
Thus, A implies the following:
When the students contribute $330 a year, they are AT THE SAME TIME previously paying $7 per year.
Not the intended meaning.

B states that students must contribute $330 a year toward their education, for which was previously paid $7 per year.
Here, it's unclear WHO previously paid $7 per year.
Also, a reader might construe that BOTH amounts are being applied to a student's education (the $330 a year AND the $7 previously paid).
To make it clear that one amount ($330 a year) is serving to REPLACE the previous amount ($7 per year), a word of contrast is needed (such as instead or whereas).
Eliminate B.

In C, previously (adverb) cannot serve to modify the $7 per year (noun phrase).
Eliminate C.

In E, the reason that students must contribute $330 a year seems to be conveyed by the modifier required previously for the cost of higher education.
The result is a nonsensical meaning:
A law that REQUIRES them to contribute $330 a year REQUIRED PREVIOUSLY.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Aman Ahuja » Wed Aug 13, 2014 12:09 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year
B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per
year
C. year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required
previously
E. year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher
education
A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to express CONTEMPORANEOUS action: an action attributed to the preceding subject and happening AT THE SAME TIME as -- and often as a result of -- the preceding action.
Thus, A implies the following:
When the students contribute $330 a year, they are AT THE SAME TIME previously paying $7 per year.
Not the intended meaning.

B states that students must contribute $330 a year toward their education, for which was previously paid $7 per year.
Here, it's unclear WHO previously paid $7 per year.
Also, a reader might construe that BOTH amounts are being applied to a student's education (the $330 a year AND the $7 previously paid).
To make it clear that one amount ($330 a year) is serving to REPLACE the previous amount ($7 per year), a word of contrast is needed (such as instead or whereas).
Eliminate B.

In C, previously (adverb) cannot serve to modify the $7 per year (noun phrase).
Eliminate C.

In E, the reason that students must contribute $330 a year seems to be conveyed by the modifier required previously for the cost of higher education.
The result is a nonsensical meaning:
A law that REQUIRES them to contribute $330 a year REQUIRED PREVIOUSLY.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.
Hi GGNY
i still don't understand why E is incorrect ...can you explain with an example,how the meaning is nonsensical.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 14, 2014 4:13 am
Aman Ahuja wrote: Hi GGNY
i still don't understand why E is incorrect ...can you explain with an example,how the meaning is nonsensical.
E: a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education.
Here, for the cost of higher education seems to indicate why payments were required previously.
If the entire modifier in red serves to modify only $7 per year, then the sentence does not indicate why students are required to contribute $330 a year.
If the modifier in red refers both to $7 per year AND to $330 a year, then we get the following nonsensical meaning:
a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year...required previously for the cost of higher education.
Neither interpretation of the modifier in red yields the intended meaning.

Also, $7 per year for the cost of higher education seems to imply that $7 per year constituted the ENTIRE cost of higher education.
The intended meaning is that $7 per year was paid TOWARD the cost of higher education, implying that the total cost was GREATER than the $7 students paid.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Aman Ahuja » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:51 am
Thank you for the amazing explanation GMAT Guru NY...
But if we are put in a situation in which one of meanings is correct for eg.Suppose in E modifier(required previously) modifying 7$ would be correct and modifying both(7$ and 330$) would be incorrect
then would the choice be correct?
OR such a scenario impossible on the real GMAT
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Aug 14, 2014 7:24 am
Aman Ahuja wrote:Thank you for the amazing explanation GMAT Guru NY...
But if we are put in a situation in which one of meanings is correct for eg.Suppose in E modifier(required previously) modifying 7$ would be correct and modifying both(7$ and 330$) would be incorrect
then would the choice be correct?
OR such a scenario impossible on the real GMAT
If it is not crystal clear what a modifier is modifying, look for a better answer choice.
In general, a modifier should be AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE to what it is modifying.
OA: a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year toward the cost of higher education
In the OA, toward the cost of higher education is right next to what it is modifying -- $330 a year -- so the intended meaning is crystal clear.
Eliminate E and pick D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion