Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMATPrep Q5

Expert replies
by nsharma » Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:10 am
OA E
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ronniecoleman » Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:25 am
IMO E

ZT < -3

so z and t have to be of different signs

2) says t < -4

so z has to be positive..

think one second that t = -4( its highest value)

Z > -3/-4
Z>.75

but we have taken highest value of t ..so as increase -negatively..
-3/-t ratio decreases...

So we cannot conclude that z > 4
Max we can say that z > 3/4
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:57 pm
Lets make it easier. Picking smart numbers works wonders for this problem and the computations dont take long.


zt < -3 Is z < 4

Stmt I

z<9

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES

INSUFF

Stmt II

t < -4 (Use same example)

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES


INSUFF

Together

Same example again no need to pick new numbers

ISNUFF

Choose E)
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:01 pm
cramya wrote:Lets make it easier. Picking smart numbers works wonders for this problem and the computations dont take long.


zt < -3 Is z < 4

Stmt I

z<9

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES

INSUFF

Stmt II

t < -4 (Use same example)

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES


INSUFF

Together

Same example again no need to pick new numbers

ISNUFF

Choose E)
Cramya,
IMO Stmt 1 is very very straight forward and does not need any calc at all.
z < 9. so z can be 8.99,.. 8, 7.... minus infinity. So some are >4 and others are < 4 and 1 of them =4. So insufficient.
So I really dint have to substitute into zt and then figure out.

is my reasoning right ??

When I saw this stmt, I thought that I am seeing a very very simple stmt, and the test makers hope that the test takers, with all their preparation for tough questions, will make this stmt unnecessarily complicated and spend time trying to solve it, thereby killing time. And this is what test makers want!!!.

Do u folks also think that stmt 1 is in the above category??

thanks
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:12 pm
Do u folks also think that stmt 1 is in the above category??
I agree. I illustrated it with numbers(as I could use it for all statements without having to pick new numbers) but if u feel comfortable attacking it conceptually then that works too.

Like u did we should do what works best for us rather than follow a certain procedure for atacking a problem. Whatever comes to the mind first. This way u get comfortable with the process and are confident in picking a choice.
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:29 pm
I agree with u Cramya.
But, because I found stmt 1 to be too simple, I thought I might be absolutely correct or absolutely wrong. Sometimes the mind tricks us into believing something and often that happens when we jump into conclusion and start following an approach.

I wanted to eliminate the "absolute wrong"..

Good, that I my approach happened to be correct. i have more confidence in solving it this way.

thanks
Join the discussion