BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep Q5

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ronniecoleman » Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:25 am
IMO E

ZT < -3

so z and t have to be of different signs

2) says t < -4

so z has to be positive..

think one second that t = -4( its highest value)

Z > -3/-4
Z>.75

but we have taken highest value of t ..so as increase -negatively..
-3/-t ratio decreases...

So we cannot conclude that z > 4
Max we can say that z > 3/4
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by cramya » Thu Dec 25, 2008 11:57 pm
Lets make it easier. Picking smart numbers works wonders for this problem and the computations dont take long.


zt < -3 Is z < 4

Stmt I

z<9

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES

INSUFF

Stmt II

t < -4 (Use same example)

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES


INSUFF

Together

Same example again no need to pick new numbers

ISNUFF

Choose E)
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Dec 26, 2008 1:01 pm
cramya wrote:Lets make it easier. Picking smart numbers works wonders for this problem and the computations dont take long.


zt < -3 Is z < 4

Stmt I

z<9

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES

INSUFF

Stmt II

t < -4 (Use same example)

z= 8 t=-1000 zt < -3 z<4 NO

z=1 t= -1000 zt<-3 z<4 YES


INSUFF

Together

Same example again no need to pick new numbers

ISNUFF

Choose E)
Cramya,
IMO Stmt 1 is very very straight forward and does not need any calc at all.
z < 9. so z can be 8.99,.. 8, 7.... minus infinity. So some are >4 and others are < 4 and 1 of them =4. So insufficient.
So I really dint have to substitute into zt and then figure out.

is my reasoning right ??

When I saw this stmt, I thought that I am seeing a very very simple stmt, and the test makers hope that the test takers, with all their preparation for tough questions, will make this stmt unnecessarily complicated and spend time trying to solve it, thereby killing time. And this is what test makers want!!!.

Do u folks also think that stmt 1 is in the above category??

thanks
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:12 pm
Do u folks also think that stmt 1 is in the above category??
I agree. I illustrated it with numbers(as I could use it for all statements without having to pick new numbers) but if u feel comfortable attacking it conceptually then that works too.

Like u did we should do what works best for us rather than follow a certain procedure for atacking a problem. Whatever comes to the mind first. This way u get comfortable with the process and are confident in picking a choice.
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Dec 26, 2008 2:29 pm
I agree with u Cramya.
But, because I found stmt 1 to be too simple, I thought I might be absolutely correct or absolutely wrong. Sometimes the mind tricks us into believing something and often that happens when we jump into conclusion and start following an approach.

I wanted to eliminate the "absolute wrong"..

Good, that I my approach happened to be correct. i have more confidence in solving it this way.

thanks
Join the discussion