BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Gmatprep PT1 question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Goal to 800 » Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:14 am
(C)

1000 - 880 (who have nothing) = 120

120 - 20 (with fever) = 100 (with inflamm)

So the answer would be 100 children developed inflammation at the site...

The question is worded to say "some developed inflammation and some developed fever"

To me, that means that no children developed both at the same time, so (A) & (B) would be sufficient TOGETHER.

It seems trickier than is written because you are used to harder Venn Diagram problems like that...

Let me know if that helps you,

Jonathan.
Join the discussion

by Jose Ferreira » Thu Mar 19, 2009 8:10 pm
Hi,

I think the question allows for the possibility that some students get BOTH inflammation AND fever.

There are 1000 total students.

Statement 1: 880 have neither inflammation nor fever. This means that the number that either
1) Have fever only
2) Have inflammation only
OR
3) Have BOTH fever and inflammation
is 1000 - 880 = 120

Statement 2: 20 have fever.
This means that the sum of those who
1) Have fever only
OR
3) Have BOTH fever and inflammation
is 20

Together, the statements tell us that 1) + 2) + 3) = 120, and that 1) + 3) = 20. Therefore, 2), the number of people that get inflammation but not fever, is 120 - 20 = 100. The answer is C.

Note that we don't know how many fall in category 1), fever only, or in category 3), BOTH fever and inflammation. We just know that the sum of those groups is 100.
Jose Ferreira
Founder and CEO, Knewton, Inc.
https://www.knewton.com/gmat
Join the discussion

by Goal to 800 » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:08 pm
Jose Ferreira wrote:Hi,

I think the question allows for the possibility that some students get BOTH inflammation AND fever.

There are 1000 total students.

Statement 1: 880 have neither inflammation nor fever. This means that the number that either
1) Have fever only
2) Have inflammation only
OR
3) Have BOTH fever and inflammation
is 1000 - 880 = 120

Statement 2: 20 have fever.
This means that the sum of those who
1) Have fever only
OR
3) Have BOTH fever and inflammation
is 20

Together, the statements tell us that 1) + 2) + 3) = 120, and that 1) + 3) = 20. Therefore, 2), the number of people that get inflammation but not fever, is 120 - 20 = 100. The answer is C.

Note that we don't know how many fall in category 1), fever only, or in category 3), BOTH fever and inflammation. We just know that the sum of those groups is 100.
I would normally agree with your strategy; however, the question does not give that much information. It states that the some got inflammation and some got fever. I cannot infer that you can get both from that and the information provided

880 out of 1000 have nothing

120 have either inflamm or fever

since 20 have fever, simple subtraction...

The question is too ambiguous to infer that you can get both...
(in reality, you can probably get both effects; however, we can only base our answers on information provided)

Let me know if I am thinking clearly...

Thanks,
Jonathan.
Join the discussion

by Reader » Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:58 pm
I sort figured it out , it doesn't matter how many children has both. We know 120 children that has to have fever or inflammation or both, of 20 has fever, the rest 100 will have only inflammation, we don't care if we have 100 people or 120 people have inflammation, we only care that we know 100 children has it only.
Join the discussion