BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep - Marbles

Expert replies
by badri077 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:28 am
A question from GMATPrep.

A certain jar contains only b black marbles, w white marbles, and r red marbles. If one marble is to be chosen at random from the jar, is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ?

1) r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
2) b-w >r

I'll post the answer after a few repplies.
Hope one of you can help me out here.

Thnx,
-B
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by samirpandeyit62 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:15 am
Answer should be A

Q asks "is the probability that the marble chosen will be red greater than the probability that the marble chosen will be white ? "

this is possible only if r>w

stm1 :
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)

i.e. r(b + r) > w (b + w)

now since b is same(constant) in both expressions so r>w to make the expression true

hence SUFF

stmt 2: b-w >r
this would be possible for both the cases r>w & w>r

i.e b =20 ,w =14 ,r =5

& b=10, w =2 & r = 6

so Insuff
Regards
Samir
Join the discussion

Re:

by badri077 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 9:52 am
Thanks.
The Ans is A.

So is brute force substitution the thumb for most such problems ? I was pretty pressed for time, tried a few values and couldn't get it right and moved on..

-B
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Sep 17, 2007 4:29 pm
I did this way:
the prob of taking red ball out = r/b+w+r
for white ball = w/b+w+r
the question is whether r/b+w+r > w/b+w+r
or we have to find whether r > w
According to 1
r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)
Add 1 to both sides
this makes r+b+w/b+w>r+b+w/b+r
this givesb+r > b+w which means r > w SUFF
2.b - w > r
here we don't know if w>r or w<r
hence A
Join the discussion

thanks

by badri077 » Mon Sep 17, 2007 9:05 pm
nice trick! Thanks for the explanation!

-B
Join the discussion

by karthick451 » Fri Sep 21, 2007 7:09 am
one more shot,

we need to prove

r/(r+b+w) > b/(r+b+w)

cross multiplying

= r^2 + br+wr > wr+bw+w^2
= r^2+br > bw+ w^2
= r/(b+w) > w/(b+r)

which is the given first condition
hence A is suff.

b is not suff because, b>r+w is given, but it doesnt say anything about r and w.
Join the discussion