BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATprep DS question

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ildude02 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:48 pm
Is the answer C?

1 says, S/S+B > s/s+b; Say S, B are later time numbers, s, b are from previous time numbers; this is insufficient since B could have decreased or S could have increased.

statment 2 says, S+B > s+b; INSUFFICIENT

combining them; for statement 1 to be true given that the S+B > s+b, S which is the numerator needs to be > s. = SUFFICEINT.

Somehow I'm thtinking I might have missed to consider some possibility. If anyone's see the obvious thing where I went wrong, please point at it. I'd appreciate it.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:56 pm
Hi ,

I think the answer is C.

Let there be S stocks and B bonds with Ruth.

Option A says :

The ratio of Stock to stcoks and bound increases.

i.e (S/S+B) increases.

for that ratio 2 increase either S should increase or B should decrease.
This option does not provide enough info.

Option B says :

The total no of S + B increases.
This also does not provide enough info.
either S could have increased or B could hav increased.


Combining both the option :

case 1) B cold hav increased while S is constan ( S+B increases)
but if this happened the ration (S/S+B) will not increase.
so B increasing when S is static is not a possibility.

Case 2) B increases S also increases ( S+ B increases) and ( also S/S+B increases )
So wen can say no of shares increase

Case 3) B decreases S increases
To comply with both the options S should increase by more than wat B decreses(S+ B shold increase) .

Case 4 ) B decreases S is constant.
this is not a possibility because S+B has 2 increase according 2 option B.

seeing cases 2 and 3 we can say that no of S will increase if both the conditions are to be satisfied.

i hope i am not confusing.

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:33 pm
Thanks for the explanation Vanish but I'm still confused. Let me see if I'm understanding this question correctly...

In order for something to increase in a ratio either we have to know that either one of the values (the numerator or the denominator) is increasing/decreasing to know if something has decreased/increased???
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:49 pm
Hi,

Consider this fraction a/b.
we can say that the ratio increases when
1)a increases b is constant
2)b decreases and a is constant
3)a increases and b decreases in the same time,

u really dont need to know the values of numerator or denominator.

Did i answer your question ??

If i did not please be more specific about what you dint understnad in this problem .
Last edited by Vignesh.4384 on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:50 pm
ok now that makes sense but I'm wondering if this is some kind of rule with fractions and ratios because I've never seen this in any of the GMAT math books I've read.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:58 pm
my advise ..
if u hav small doubts like these .. just take a pencil and paper and write down a fraction and play around with it. There is no better way to learn than doing it urself.
Not every thing is given in the test book :wink:
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:49 pm
Thanks for the advice! :-)
Join the discussion