Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMATprep DS question

Expert replies
by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:46 am
Is the answer "E"?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ildude02 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 4:48 pm
Is the answer C?

1 says, S/S+B > s/s+b; Say S, B are later time numbers, s, b are from previous time numbers; this is insufficient since B could have decreased or S could have increased.

statment 2 says, S+B > s+b; INSUFFICIENT

combining them; for statement 1 to be true given that the S+B > s+b, S which is the numerator needs to be > s. = SUFFICEINT.

Somehow I'm thtinking I might have missed to consider some possibility. If anyone's see the obvious thing where I went wrong, please point at it. I'd appreciate it.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:56 pm
Hi ,

I think the answer is C.

Let there be S stocks and B bonds with Ruth.

Option A says :

The ratio of Stock to stcoks and bound increases.

i.e (S/S+B) increases.

for that ratio 2 increase either S should increase or B should decrease.
This option does not provide enough info.

Option B says :

The total no of S + B increases.
This also does not provide enough info.
either S could have increased or B could hav increased.


Combining both the option :

case 1) B cold hav increased while S is constan ( S+B increases)
but if this happened the ration (S/S+B) will not increase.
so B increasing when S is static is not a possibility.

Case 2) B increases S also increases ( S+ B increases) and ( also S/S+B increases )
So wen can say no of shares increase

Case 3) B decreases S increases
To comply with both the options S should increase by more than wat B decreses(S+ B shold increase) .

Case 4 ) B decreases S is constant.
this is not a possibility because S+B has 2 increase according 2 option B.

seeing cases 2 and 3 we can say that no of S will increase if both the conditions are to be satisfied.

i hope i am not confusing.

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:33 pm
Thanks for the explanation Vanish but I'm still confused. Let me see if I'm understanding this question correctly...

In order for something to increase in a ratio either we have to know that either one of the values (the numerator or the denominator) is increasing/decreasing to know if something has decreased/increased???
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:49 pm
Hi,

Consider this fraction a/b.
we can say that the ratio increases when
1)a increases b is constant
2)b decreases and a is constant
3)a increases and b decreases in the same time,

u really dont need to know the values of numerator or denominator.

Did i answer your question ??

If i did not please be more specific about what you dint understnad in this problem .
Last edited by Vignesh.4384 on Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:50 pm
ok now that makes sense but I'm wondering if this is some kind of rule with fractions and ratios because I've never seen this in any of the GMAT math books I've read.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 9:58 pm
my advise ..
if u hav small doubts like these .. just take a pencil and paper and write down a fraction and play around with it. There is no better way to learn than doing it urself.
Not every thing is given in the test book :wink:
Join the discussion

by mlane25269 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:49 pm
Thanks for the advice! :-)
Join the discussion