Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMATPrep DS - Difficult for me

Expert replies
by chatekar » Sun Jul 15, 2007 10:23 am
This is from the GMATPrep

Is |x| = y - z?

(1) x + y = z
(2) x < 0

Please advice.

Thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by givemeanid » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:23 pm
Is |x| = y - z

(1) x + y = z
Doesn't tell anything about whether y > z or y < z.
If x = -1, y = 3, z = 2. |-1| = 3 - 2. True.
If x = 1, y = 2, z = 3. |1| not equal to 2 - 3. False
NOT SUFFICIENT.

(2) x < 0
Doesn't say anything about y and z.
NOT SUFFICIENT.

Combining:
x = z - y and x < 0. This could mean z is -ve and y is -ve or z is +ve, y is +ve.
x = -3, y = -2, z = -5. |x| = 3 = -2 - (-5). True
x = -3, y = 4, z = 7. |x| = 3 not equal to 4 - 7.
NOT SUFFICIENT.

Answer is (E). What is OA?
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:41 pm
givemeanid wrote:
Combining:
x = -3, y = 4, z = 7. |x| = 3 not equal to 4 - 7.
givemeanid, we don't get x+y = z for the above case.

Close. give it another shot.
Join the discussion

by givemeanid » Sun Jul 15, 2007 1:58 pm
Damn carelessness. I need to be careful! Thanks Jay.
So It Goes
Join the discussion

by chatekar » Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:54 pm
givemeanid,

Thanks for the explanation.
I'm in office right now, once I get back to home, I will post the OA.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by highfive287 » Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:45 pm
Hi there,

the question is asking whether /x/ = y - z

(1) the equation above can be written as -x = y - z (I) or x = y-z (II). We

know from (II) that /x/ = y -z. We need to examine (I).

For (I), if you times (-1) to both sides of equation, (I) will become

x = -y + z. Hence, it can also be written as x + y = z, which will be as

same as the first assumption (x + y = z). Sufficient

(2) x < 0 . It is not sufficient to determine if /x/ = y - z

The answer is A
Join the discussion

by marvelxx35 » Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:05 am
1) x + y = z or x = z - y

multiply by -1 to get: -x = y - z

-x = y - z, therefore the statement can only be true when x is negative.
-(-x) = |x|, so when x is negative, it's true
-x != |x|, so when x is positive, it's false

2) x<0

Not enough information.

1 and 2 together tells us that since x<0, the above equation will satisfy the given problem b/c when x is negative, |x| = y - z.
Join the discussion

by bingojohn » Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:33 am
[quote="chatekar"]givemeanid,

Thanks for the explanation.
I'm in office right now, once I get back to home, I will post the OA.

Thanks[/quote]

The answer is [C], sufficient together but neither alone
Join the discussion

by lalitgmat » Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:35 pm
If you start from (B), x < 0 implies |x| = (-x), y & z does not come into picture. So we have to take stmt A.
from A alone we have x = -(y - z ).

Combining (A) and (B) x = (y -z )
and principle of modulus states, |x| = a implies -a <= x < a
in this case 'a' being ( y - z ).

Hence Both stmts are sufficient. However, first stmt deduction, x = (z -y) or -(y -z) holds true only when x < 0.

Hence option (C)...Nice question.
"We always take |x| as -x and +x , remeber here x can be -ve but |x| is always is +ve."
Join the discussion

by bingojohn » Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:54 am
Also, just wanted to point out to chatekar, correct usage of the word advice (vs advise).

Advice is an abstract noun, representing someone's advice to you.
Advise is a verb, the action of providing advice to someone.

Ignore this, in case that was just a mis-spell... (mis-spells like this one will kill you in AWA though).
Join the discussion

by chatekar » Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:05 am
Thanks bingojohn
Thats was pretty silly mistake
Join the discussion