BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATPrep Bookstore

Expert replies
by lilu » Wed May 06, 2009 8:31 pm
I would appreciate an explanation :D
I'll post the OA after a few responses

Sorry, I had trouble attaching the question.

Here it is typed:
A bookstore that sells books sells each of its paperbacks for a certain price and each of its hardcover books for a certain price. If Joe, Maria, and Paul bought books in this store, how much did Maria for 1 paperback and hardcover book?

1. Joe bought 2 paperback and 3 hardcover books for $12.50
2. Paul bought 4 paperback and 6 hardcover books for $25.00
The more you look, the more you see.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: GMATPrep Bookstore

by Vemuri » Wed May 06, 2009 11:48 pm
IMO E.

Statement 1: Can be represented in an equation as 2P+3H=12.5. 2 variables & 1 equation, so not sufficient

Statement 2: Can be represented in an equation as 4P+6H=25 ==> 2P+3H=12.5. 2 variables & 1 equation, so not sufficient

Together also the statements are not sufficient because they both represent the same equation.
Join the discussion

by Vitalina » Thu May 07, 2009 3:05 am
Definitely E :D
Previous explanation by Vemuri is very good )
Join the discussion

Re: GMATPrep Bookstore

by lilu » Thu May 07, 2009 6:45 am
Vemuri wrote:IMO E.

Statement 1: Can be represented in an equation as 2P+3H=12.5. 2 variables & 1 equation, so not sufficient

Statement 2: Can be represented in an equation as 4P+6H=25 ==> 2P+3H=12.5. 2 variables & 1 equation, so not sufficient

Together also the statements are not sufficient because they both represent the same equation.
Thank you, Vemuri!
I made such a silly mistake. I thought that we'd be able to set up a second equation P+H=5 and find out the values of P and H, but I did read the question carefully: we need to find the price of P and H books,not the amounts.
The more you look, the more you see.
Join the discussion