BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATprep accuracy..please advise!

Expert replies
by GMATaddiction » Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:10 am
Hi Guys/Gals

I just completed a GMAT prep 2 exam and I scored a 46 on the quantitative section.

I dont understand how thats possible since I got 17 questions wrong!!! Could there by any errors with the software?
Is it normal to get a 46Q with 17 errors?

Also, I have noticed that the Quantitative section of GMATprep is quite easier than the real GMAT, is this true to some degree or just my perception?

Really would appreciate some insight into these questions!

THANK YOU!
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by DanaJ » Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:42 am
Actually, the quantitative section is known to be a bit more generous than the verbal. That is, you can get a pretty good score even with a lot of errors. Remember: the number of questions you got wrong is not everything that counts towards your score, it's just a part.

I'd say that GMATprep is comparable with the real thing in terms of quant - maybe the real GMAT was only a bit harder than GMATprep, but not so much as to completely throw me off.
Join the discussion