BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMATprep: a group of teenagers

Expert replies
by nhai2003 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:43 am
A study followed a group of teenagers who had never smoked and tracked whether they took up smoking and how their mental health changed. After one year, the incidence of depression among those who had taken up smoking was four times as high as it was among those who had not. Since nicotine in cigarettes changes brain chemistry, perhaps thereby affecting mood, it is likely that smoking contributes to depression in teenagers.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A. Participants who were depressed at the start of the study were no more likely to be smokers after one year than those who were not depressed.

B. The study did not distinguish between participants who smoked only occasionally and those who were heavy smokers.

C. Few, if any, of the participants in the study were friends or relatives of other participants.

D. Some participants entered and emerged from a period of depression within the year of the study.

E. The researchers did not track use of alcohol by the teenagers.

OA later. Thanks guys!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by JeffB » Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:51 am
A?

B - Weakens
C - Who cares
D - Weakens
E - Who cares
Join the discussion

answer

by spring_bustle » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:07 am
IMO D.

A. Weakens
B. smoking is smoking, be it occasional or heavy and smoking would have caused depression.
C. it might imply passive smoking , bu there is no mention of it and we are not sure whether they are smokers or not.
E. Effect of alcohol is not in the argument.

what is the OA ?

spring
Join the discussion

by spring_bustle » Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:10 am
A - It is not mentioned that whether the participants who were depressed at the beginning of the study were not depressed at the end of the study.
Join the discussion

by nhai2003 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:26 pm
OA: A. Thanks all :lol:
Join the discussion

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 6:43 pm
What is the general concept tested in such problems?>
My understanding:
To infer that A causes B, we should be sure that B was not the cause of A.

e.g. To conclude that Smoking causes depression, we should be sure that it was not depression that caused smoking. As in a grp of guys, we see a subgroup that is smoker as well as depressed so we need to differentiate what cause what.

Is that correct?
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:30 pm
I think A is the right answer here
Join the discussion

by akshaydhande » Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:06 am
Simply put A states that all were equally likely to be smokers.

The possibility that the ones depressed at the start were no more likely to be smokers than those who were not depressed; ie all were equally likely strengthens the argument.
700 in reach.
Join the discussion