BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmatprep-2

Expert replies
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gmatman1 » Sun Dec 28, 2008 11:47 am
(A) is False. In my opinion it is very clear why this statement does not weaken the argument.

(B) is False. Our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms does not affect reality! The statement does not weaken the argument.

(C) is True. This fact would seriously weaken the argument. Extra ingredients might make a big difference!

(D) is False. This fact is totally irrelevant and therefore does not weaken the argument.

(E) is False. This fact does not weaken the argument.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:06 pm
The argument is that the spray is more efective than the gel (even though the ingreduients/conc is same for both ) since the cold virus tends to be more concentarted around the nose.


Choice C) weakens the argument by saying that there could be a different reason why gels are not effective -> since these contain citrci acid that interfere with the chemical effects of zinc in treating cold.
Join the discussion

by Indradeep » Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:22 am
Doesn't C provide an explanation to why zinc logenzes are not as effective. I donot understand how this could weaken the argument.
Join the discussion

by bkumars8 » Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:30 am
I'll go with B.
Join the discussion

by raghavsarathy » Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:25 am
IMO - C

The argument is if the zinc content is more effective when applied to the nose than when taken orally.

C weakens this because it states that it is not the zinc in the logozenes which is inefective. Instead , the other ingredients make it ineffective.

OA ?
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:53 am
Indradeep wrote:Doesn't C provide an explanation to why zinc logenzes are not as effective. I donot understand how this could weaken the argument.
C gives an alternative reason(other than the presence of cold virus in nose..) why zinc logenzes are not effective and thats what we want in order to weaken the argument..
hence C is the best choice..
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:37 am
Vote for C. E strengthens the argument rather than weakening it.
Join the discussion

by gmat_dest » Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:26 am
Should be C. It weakens the conclusion by providing a alternate reason for why the Zinc lozenges did not work.
Join the discussion

by Sharma_Gaurav » Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:34 pm
answer C

Because we do not have any other choice which says that Zinc zel effectiveness is not due to the viruses= nose concentration , but due to some other reason, hence only other method to weaken the arg is to find a choice which gives a explanaiton to say why the zinc logonozes does not work - due to extra ingredient.
Join the discussion

by microke » Thu Jul 23, 2009 8:55 pm
IMO E.
The conclusion here is : More virus in NOSE than in MOUTH.

If the research experiments shows the same results for gel (mouth) as well as spray ( NOSE), then in totality, both are ineffective in treating the cold and conclusively there can not be more virus in the nose.

OA-Please.
Join the discussion

by armaan700+ » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:33 pm
IMO C

My reason is that it can be weaken by either proving that some property of gel not present in logozenes is making it effective
or
some property of logozenes not in gel is making it ineffective.

only c provides the later information so it has to correct
Join the discussion

by yogami » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:25 pm
I went with C due to absurd reasons. First of all if this was real gmat I would have gone with A or C, maybe A more!!
But since you already marked A and then posted the question I assumed that you needed clarification on why you were wrong. But to be dead honest A and C are very close man!!
200 or 800. It don't matter no more.
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:14 am
Yes, A & C is very close. I will also go with C
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:57 pm
Looking at it now, A makes sense
Join the discussion