BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT TUTOR

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Fri May 09, 2014 8:55 am
Two farmers, who never left their farms their whole lives, were looking at their dogs and observed that all their border collies were black and white. The border collies were the only things that the farmers ever saw as a mix of black and white. Farmer Gil luckily but correctly observed that if something is a border collie then it must be black and white. Farmer Geva then remarked that if something is not black and white, then it is not a border collie.

The argument is flawed primarily because Farmer Geva:

A. fails to realize that there are other dog breeds apart from border collies
B. fails to realize that being black and white is a necessary but insufficient condition to be called a border collie
C. lacks sufficient information on which to base the condition for being a border collie
D. only observes one type of phenomenon-border collies and their color
E. demonstrates only limited knowledge about the world outside
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Fri May 09, 2014 12:50 pm
Hi imskpwr,

This prompt is an overly-simplified attempt to test your knowledge of what's called a "contra-positive"; it's an LSAT concept that you will probably never see on the GMAT.

Contra-positives are "equivalent" statements.

eg. "If X happens, then Y happens" is equivalent to "If Y doesn't happen, then X doesn't happen"

What is the source of this question?

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by mathrupradeep » Sat May 10, 2014 7:03 pm
Hi Rich,

The answer is D ?
Join the discussion

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Mon May 12, 2014 1:00 pm
This is a strange question with no correct answer, and a little Googling turned up what seems to be its source. (DON'T pay attention to the explanation there, however, as it's incorrect.)

As Rich notes, the contrapositive is an important concept on the LSAT but a minor (perhaps irrelevant) one on the GMAT, which is much more about common sense arguments than about logical deductions. But if we're going to use the contrapositive, we ought to use it correctly, and the OA (which is B) is WRONG.

Here's the gist. The statement "If a, then b" is the SAME as the statement "If not b, then not a". To see why, consider the first statement: if a happens, then b MUST happen. So if b didn't happen, it's impossible for a to have happened: if a had happened, then b would've happened. (For instance, consider the statement "if I win the Nobel Prize, then I'll be famous". I'm not famous, so I must not have won the Nobel Prize.)

Now let's return to this odd argument. If Farmer Gil "correctly" observed that

"If something is a border collie, then that thing must be black and white"

then the obvious contrapositive of this statement is "If something is NOT black and white, then that thing is NOT a border collie". Since we're told Farmer Gil is correct, Farmer Geva has made an astute inference from a correct statement, and is ALSO correct. Nothing is wrong with his argument!

Now what I assume that the author of the question MEANT to have Farmer Geva say was "If something is black and white, then that thing is a border collie". That would be an example of mixing up necessary and sufficient conditions and would be an improper deduction from Farmer Gil's statement ... but if my aunt had a mustache, she'd be my uncle.
Join the discussion

by David@VeritasPrep » Tue May 13, 2014 5:40 pm
Matt said:
(For instance, consider the statement "if I win the Nobel Prize, then I'll be famous". I'm not famous, so I must not have won the Nobel Prize.)
The fact is Matt, that you are famous! You are Matt from G-Matt Mondays! Therefore your argument is false and since you are famous maybe you have won the Nobel Prize as well???

Seriously, though this is a strange question. Best to take Matt's advice and ignore this one.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion