BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat test code 31

Expert replies
by nikhilkatira » Fri Jun 25, 2010 3:51 am
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers' claims must, therefore, be wrong.

The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.

(B) It treats the vague term "poverty" as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.

(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.

(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.

(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country's average per capita income.
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by albatross86 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:42 am
Demographers' claims:
1. Average per capita income in Kuptala < that in Bahlton
2. Poverty rare in Kuptala, but in Bahlton half of population is in extreme poverty

Conclusion is that 1 of the 2 claims MUST be wrong.

WEAKENER:


A. It does not particularly reject claim 1, it only says 1 of the 2 must be wrong.

B. Well perhaps poverty does in fact have a precise and universal meaning. Also , is this a flaw in the argument or a flaw in the claims of the demographers:? (which is actually a premise to the argument)

C. Actually we are not comparing actual number of people here at all. We are comparing income per person between 2 countries, and thus the percentage of people who are extremely poor is relevant to the conclusion.

D. Social significance is not at all in scope.

E. AHAH BINGO. This has a bit of statistical trivia in it. Average K < Average B. But we have that half of the people in B have much lower income than this average. This is clearly explained if the people in K all earn around the mean, but the people in B fluctuate around it. So it is possible that this increased mean of B even though they have 50% poor people, is due to the fact that they have 50% extremely rich people. This explains the APPARENT discrepancy between the two claims and thus WEAKENS the author's conclusion that 1 of the 2 must be wrong.

Pick E.
Join the discussion

by selango » Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:17 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:03 am
selango wrote:IMO E
@Nikil bhai

long time back kahani....

https://www.beatthegmat.com/poverty-t47160.html
Join the discussion