BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat test code 31 cr

Expert replies
by nikhilkatira » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:27 am
In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.

The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.

(B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.

(C) The undated document was written before 1765.

(D) The arrest record was written after the undated document.

(E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by albatross86 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:51 am
2 documents:

1. May 3, 1976: Arrest for peddling without license.
2. UNDATED: Statement asserting he has been peddling on and off for 20 years.

What can we INFER from this?

A. Not necessarily - what if he continued peddling even after being arrested?

B. Not necessarily - the one on may 3rd could have been the only arrest.

C. 1739+20 = 1759. This means that even if May 3, 1739 was the FIRST day that Schnitzler started peddling, the document saying he HAD been peddling for 20 years could not be true beyond the year 1759. Thus, it MUST be true that the document was written before 1765.

D. Not at all. What if he was arrested and then made the statement in jail?

E. This is too subjective. We cannot judge which of the 2 documents is BETTER.

Pick C.

This question is not really like a proper GMAT one. Don't bother too much with it.
Join the discussion

by selango » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:51 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by nikhilkatira » Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:59 am
albatross86 wrote:2 documents:

1. May 3, 1976: Arrest for peddling without license.
2. UNDATED: Statement asserting he has been peddling on and off for 20 years.

What can we INFER from this?

A. Not necessarily - what if he continued peddling even after being arrested?

B. Not necessarily - the one on may 3rd could have been the only arrest.

C. 1739+20 = 1759. This means that even if May 3, 1739 was the FIRST day that Schnitzler started peddling, the document saying he HAD been peddling for 20 years could not be true beyond the year 1759. Thus, it MUST be true that the document was written before 1765.

D. Not at all. What if he was arrested and then made the statement in jail?

E. This is too subjective. We cannot judge which of the 2 documents is BETTER.

Pick C.

This question is not really like a proper GMAT one. Don't bother too much with it.
OA is C

its from official gmat test codes
Best,
Nikhil H. Katira
Join the discussion

by albatross86 » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:01 am
its from official gmat test codes
Really! Well I still feel the choices are not too good. Still C is clearly the winner :)

The reason I say that it's not good is because GMAT usually doesn't include subjective opinions in answer choices, especially in logical reasoning. Though if you do see 2 answers, one of which is logical and one subjective, like in this problem, pick the logical one which MUST be true over the subjective one which COULD be true.
Join the discussion

by kvcpk » Fri Jun 25, 2010 5:57 am
The question should have said, "Which of the following must be true" instead of "best support which of the following conclusions"

C seems to be the only closer option in any case.
Join the discussion