BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

gmat set 4 cr II

Expert replies
by clammiestqasar » Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:53 am
Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by goyalsau » Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:13 am
I will go with e,
Join the discussion

by crack_attack_gmat » Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:45 am
(A) is a restatement of the stimulus - using the information provided in ( "since after being ..................than other inmates")

(B) out of context - unrelated to the passage

(C) The comparison makes sense when all inmates are equally likely to commit crimes and equally likely to NOT commit crimes when having taken a college course. So this sounds like a valid assumption to base the stimulus upon. Correct Answer

(D) high school courses - out of context comparison.

(E) No mention is made of popularity etc in the stimulus.

Ans is (C) IMHO. Whats the OA plz.
43Q, 26V ( try 1 570)
Need 780
Join the discussion

by clammiestqasar » Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:19 pm
OA is A but even i think it should be C
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:29 pm
IMO A

very good question.
Even I initially selected C.


If the conclusion had been as:
this action is clearly help to the governor’s ultimate goal :

then C would have been an assumption.


but the conclusiob is :

this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal. -> so C is not an assumption
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:35 am
clammiestqasar wrote:Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
So the conclusion is:

Denying CLC does not reduce crime.

What author assumes while concluding this.
CLC are likely to contribute to reducing crime.

C indicates that CLC do contribute to reducing crime.

A says that absence of CLC is unlikely to reduce crime.

This does not mean that
Presence of CLC is likely to reduce crime


I will go with C.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:36 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
clammiestqasar wrote:Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
So the conclusion is:

Denying CLC does not reduce crime.

What author assumes while concluding this.
CLC are likely to contribute to reducing crime.

C indicates that CLC do contribute to reducing crime.

A says that absence of CLC is unlikely to reduce crime.

This does not mean that
Presence of CLC is likely to reduce crime


I will go with C.
After posting this answer, I searched the question.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/governor-and ... 14221.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-newspaper- ... 11320.html
Join the discussion