Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

gmat set 4 cr II

Expert replies
by clammiestqasar » Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:53 am
Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by goyalsau » Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:13 am
I will go with e,
Join the discussion

by crack_attack_gmat » Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:45 am
(A) is a restatement of the stimulus - using the information provided in ( "since after being ..................than other inmates")

(B) out of context - unrelated to the passage

(C) The comparison makes sense when all inmates are equally likely to commit crimes and equally likely to NOT commit crimes when having taken a college course. So this sounds like a valid assumption to base the stimulus upon. Correct Answer

(D) high school courses - out of context comparison.

(E) No mention is made of popularity etc in the stimulus.

Ans is (C) IMHO. Whats the OA plz.
43Q, 26V ( try 1 570)
Need 780
Join the discussion

by clammiestqasar » Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:19 pm
OA is A but even i think it should be C
Join the discussion

by paes » Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:29 pm
IMO A

very good question.
Even I initially selected C.


If the conclusion had been as:
this action is clearly help to the governor’s ultimate goal :

then C would have been an assumption.


but the conclusiob is :

this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal. -> so C is not an assumption
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:35 am
clammiestqasar wrote:Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
So the conclusion is:

Denying CLC does not reduce crime.

What author assumes while concluding this.
CLC are likely to contribute to reducing crime.

C indicates that CLC do contribute to reducing crime.

A says that absence of CLC is unlikely to reduce crime.

This does not mean that
Presence of CLC is likely to reduce crime


I will go with C.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:36 am
FightWithGMAT wrote:
clammiestqasar wrote:Newspaper editorial:

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.
So the conclusion is:

Denying CLC does not reduce crime.

What author assumes while concluding this.
CLC are likely to contribute to reducing crime.

C indicates that CLC do contribute to reducing crime.

A says that absence of CLC is unlikely to reduce crime.

This does not mean that
Presence of CLC is likely to reduce crime


I will go with C.
After posting this answer, I searched the question.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/governor-and ... 14221.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-newspaper- ... 11320.html
Join the discussion