BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Raw Scores...

Launched April 26, 2006
Expert replies
by ConfidenceIsKey » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:36 am
Does anyone know if the same raw scores almost always equate to the same overall score on the actual GMAT? In other words, if two test takers take the GMAT on the same day, at the same test center and both receive scores of Q:48, V:48, will those identical raw scores generate the same overall scores?
thanks,
ConfidenceIsKey
Join the discussion
Source: — Ask Stacy Blackman |

by BlueRain » Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:50 am
In my experience, that should be the case.

I think the GMAT scoring scale changes on an annual basis, and you can get a basic feeling of the scale from the official site.

https://www.mba.com/mba/TaketheGMAT/Tool ... Report.htm
Join the discussion

by ConfidenceIsKey » Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:05 am
Thanks, BlueRain -

I guess my question wasn't specific enough. What I'd really like to know is if anyone has information from GMAC indicating how they actually arrive at the Total Score (200-800)? The raw scores are assigned percentiles, based on ranking information. But, the GMAC does not seem to explain how they go from raw score to total score. Does anyone have any insight on this?

thanks,
ConfidenceIsKey
Join the discussion

by BlueRain » Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:34 pm
Not that I can find. That's why I said basic feeling in my original post, since there is no public formula available.
Join the discussion

by Lisa Anderson » Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:21 am
Dear ConfidenceIsKey & BlueRain,

You definitely will not get the actual formulas from GMAC. My understanding is they arrive at the total scores and percentiles incorporating raw test scores from the past 3 years into the equation. That sample of scores is always in a little flux as the range will shift more than once per year. I would expect two tests taken within 31 days of each other with the same raw scores to have the same percentiles and total score. I also would not be surprised if the numbers are the same for two tests taken within months of each other.

Regards,
Lisa
Lisa Anderson
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

Stacy, I took the GMAT and got the same exact raw scores as some others who received a 740. I received a 730. Should I be concerned that this was unfair?
Join the discussion

by Lisa Anderson » Wed Nov 05, 2008 1:14 pm
You were not treated unfairly. As discussed in the thread, the scaled score (which is your 730) will have some variance as it is calculated against a pool of test scores that is always changing. Your test report should have more detail on how the scaled scores are calculated.

Regards,
Lisa
Lisa Anderson
Consultant
Stacy Blackman Consulting

Learn more about me
Join the discussion

by bschoolbound » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:21 pm
Thanks Lisa, but you also mentioned the raw scores are pooled against scores in the last 3 years. The people who I initially mentioned got 10 points higher with the same sub-scores as me only 1 to 3 months ago. That's why I think there's a problem.
Join the discussion