Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAT Prep2?? (M and V)

Expert replies
by dferm » Thu May 15, 2008 6:36 pm
Please Help...


Thanks...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by amitansu » Mon May 19, 2008 3:14 am
First i would try to ans from Statement 2, because i got little confused with statemet 1, so left it for the time being :-)
Initially i thought B is the ans !!

From 2 : m is negative and seeing the given statement mv<pv<0
we can say p is also negative, eventually saying v is positive.So sufficient.

Now when i got 2 is sufficient , i tried statement 1 once again to cross verufy.

If you plugging in no. noway we can get v <0 and mv<pv>mv.so V has to be positive.Sufficient.

The first statement though simple , is little tricky especially under timed test condition.
Join the discussion

by mim3 » Mon May 19, 2008 11:05 am
This question is actually straight forward if you just plug in different values for v with different combos of signs for m & p. Because the question only asks about the sign of v, we should use 1 and -1 as values for V and see what we get.

stem: mv < pv < 0
Just from the stem we know that the signs are dfferent for m&p than they are for v because their product is less than 0. With that, we also know that m & p must have the same sign. Now the statements are much easier to translate

1. m < p- ok, we can plug in different values to see what we get.

v= 1
m=-3
p= -2

-3 < -2 < 0 that works...

v= -1
m= 2
p= 3

-2 > -3 < 0... doesn't work.

v has to be positive- sufficient.

2. Again, based on what we know from the stem, if m < 0 then v > 0. Logically, only considering mv < 0, we also see that v > 0
Join the discussion