Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

GMAT Prep / Wage increase

Expert replies
by Blast » Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:13 pm
Wasn't sure about this one...

Any help is appreciated
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by earth@work » Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:50 pm
(1) Jacks hourly wage was 5$/hr more than Mark
Let x be mark's wage/hr then jacks=x+5
Difference after 6% increase will be = (x+5)*(106/100)-x*(106/100)
where the variable x cancels out and we get the answer.... (1) is sufficent
(2)Jack:mark =4:3
let x be total wages then Jack's =4x/7 mark's = 3x/7
After 6% increase difference = (106/100)*(4x/7-3x/7)... we hv no other info therefore (2) is insufficient
ans A
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Wed Dec 03, 2008 10:02 pm
Let M be Mark's wage/hr and J be Jacks wage/hr
We need to find out J -M

Given that J and M had a 6% increase in wage/hr.
So wages per hr will be 1.6J and 1.6M.

Stmt1:
Before increase
J = M +5
=> J-M = 5 ------------ 1
After the increase we have.
1.6J - 1.6M = ?
= 1.6(J-M) ------------ 2
Substituting 1 in 2
= 1.6 * 5
Sufficient.

Stmt 2.

J/M = 4/3.
J = 4M/3.

After the increase, we have
1.6J = (1.6 *4 * M)/ 3
1.6J = 1.6 * 4M/3

We cannot find J -M.. Hence insufficient.

So A
Join the discussion

by raajan_p » Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:54 pm
You can even substitute values

Lets take the before wage increase salary of Jack as 10 and Mark as 5.

After considering 6% wage increase, the sal of Jack would be 10.6 and that of Mark would be 5.3

You can substitute any number for Mark and a value which is 5 units greater than Mark for Jack..you will get the same difference...

So, you can find the difference and hence A is sufficient...

W.R.T statement 2) we know only the ratio of Jack to Mark as 4:3, but not the actual values...

So insufficient...

Hence A.
Join the discussion