BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP

Expert replies
by Umar82 » Wed Apr 15, 2009 5:06 pm
Please help with this question. I'm sure it has been answered before but I can't find it on this forum.

Thanks!

Answer is "D".
Attachments
GMAT PREP Question.doc
(78 KiB) Downloaded 129 times
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by wally » Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:16 pm
Breaking it down in parts to build a suitable equation that describes what is happening:

A Contractor combine x tons of a gravel mixture that contained 10 percent gravel G, by weight,

X tons x 0.1G = X0.1G

with y tons of a micture that contained 2 percent gravel G, by weight,

Y tons x 0.02G = Y0.02G

to produce z tons ofa mixture that was 5 percent gravel G, by weight. What is the value of x?

Z tons x 0.05G = Z0.05G

The complete expression is therefore:

X0.1G + Y0.02G = Z0.05G

We can divide both sides of the equation to disregard G, thus the expression becomes:

X0.1 + 0.02Y = Z0.05 --- (A)

Implied in the question is a constraint that X + Y = Z. Using a logical example, if we add 2 tons of gravel (X) to 3 tons of gravel (Y) we must end up with 5 tons of gravel (Z).

X + Y =Z ---(B)

Using equation (A) and (B) to describe the what is happening we can now evaluate the sufficiency of statement 1.

1) Y= 10

Therefore:

Equation B becomes
X + 10 = Z

Substituting this into equation A we get
0.1X + 0.02(10) = 0.05(X + 10)

We can continue to solve but at this stage one should be able to see that we have a sufficient solution for X. SUFFICIENT

1) z = 16

Equation B becomes
X + Y = 16
Y = 16 - X

Substituting into Equation A we get
0.1X +0.02Y = 0.05(16)
Furthermore Y = 16 - x
0.1X + 0.02(16 - X) = 0.05(16)

Again, we can continue to solve but with one linear equation and one variable it is clear we can arrive at a value for X. SUFFICIENT

Therefore, ANSWER is D. Each statement alone is sufficient.
Join the discussion

by cubicle_bound_misfit » Wed Apr 15, 2009 8:57 pm
basically you get two equations

x+y=z

and

.05z=.1x+.02y

each stmt reduces one variable and hence x is solvable. Hence D.
Cubicle Bound Misfit
Join the discussion