BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT prep

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 5:26 am
Stem - 1.6 billion - 67.8 by 6 highest contributing countries and the balance of 32.2% by the remaining 153 nations
Statement I : 56% paird by the 4 highest contributing nations (or an average of 14%). Thus amount contributed by the 5th and 6th ranking nation = 67.8 - 56 = 11.8% (or an average of 5.9%). This is all we can deduce...Hence insufficient
Statement II : Country X paid 4.8% of the total expenditure...Insufficient since we do not know how much the others contributed
Statement I and II: Even here we cannot determine whether X was in the Top 6 bracket
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 8:47 am
For the second question

Statement I : x intercept>1 which means one co-ordinate of the lying on the line k = (x,0) wherein x>0...Now this point can lie within the circle or even outside the circle....hence insufficient

Statement II : Slope of line = -1/10; equation would be y = mx+c ; y=-x/10 + c...This is insufficient too

Statement I and II : one point if (x,0) and the slope is -x/10; however we do not know the y-intercept or the co-ordinates of even a single point on the line...Hence it should be E
Join the discussion

by Cybermusings » Mon May 21, 2007 8:51 am
For the third question...

Statement I : Over a period of time S: S+B increased...this can happen either because the number of shares in Ruth's portfolio increased or because Ruth disposed off some of her bonds thereby increasing the ratio of shares in the total portfolio...hence insufficient

Statement II: We only know that the total number of S+B increased; this could have happened for 2 reasons; either the number of shares increased or the number of bonds in the portfolio increased; hence insufficient

Statement I and II: S+B increased and S: S+B increased; combining the two we can say that the number of shares in Ruth's portfolio increased
Join the discussion