Need some logic on this
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Maxx
Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.
See classesLearn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.
Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.
with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep
Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.
with
Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.
scoobydooby wrote:
Statement: 2: PQR+PRQ=150, it follows that QPR=30, which is what we started statement 1 with, hence sufficent
In triangle QPR, PQR+PRQ=150, or QPR=30 (sum of all angles is 180, two are 150, and the third is therefore 30). we started with this info, ie QPR=30 in statement 1 and found it to be sufficent, here also we are down to the same information. it is therefore sufficient.ReenaMo wrote:scoobydooby wrote:
Statement: 2: PQR+PRQ=150, it follows that QPR=30, which is what we started statement 1 with, hence sufficent
Can you explain the concept behind how you found Statement 2 sufficient?
Thanks