BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT Prep

Expert replies
by moneyman » Sat May 10, 2008 5:56 am
List S and list T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40 and 50 are in both lists , is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T ?

(1)The integer 25 is in list S

(2)The integer 45 is in list T

And C

What is the fastest approach ? What is the best way to calculate SD here?
Maxx
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: GMAT Prep

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat May 10, 2008 2:05 pm
moneyman wrote:List S and list T each contain 5 positive integers, and for each list the average of the integers in the list is 40. If the integers 30,40 and 50 are in both lists , is the standard deviation of the integers in list S greater than the standard deviation of the integers in list T ?

(1)The integer 25 is in list S

(2)The integer 45 is in list T

And C

What is the fastest approach ? What is the best way to calculate SD here?
You never need to calculate SD on the GMAT. In DS, we're just seeing if we have enough info to calculate.

In this question, if we know what the sets are, we can certainly calculate SD.

We already know 3/5 numbers on each list, so we're not far off. We also know the average of each list, and therefore the sum (= avg * # of terms).

(1) S contains 25. This allows us to determine the 5th member of S, but we don't know enough about T.

(2) T contains 45. This allows us to determine the 5th member of T, but we don't know enough about S.

Together: We know the full sets for S and T. If we know all the terms in a set, we can calculate ANYTHING about that set, including SD. If we can calculate both SDs, we can certainly answer the question: choose (c).
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Sat May 10, 2008 9:02 pm
Got it..Thanks Stuart
Maxx
Join the discussion