BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

GMAT PREP SC31

Expert replies
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by acecoolan » Sun Dec 07, 2008 1:15 pm
IMO E.

No other statement maintains the parallelism and the meaning correctly
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:19 am
I believe it is E.
"Would be x and would be Y " are parallel.

I am not sure about this. Pls correct me.

Here "would" is used coz the sentence indicates hope, or a desire.
Join the discussion

by ronniecoleman » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:46 am
IMO E


must is redundant:


Justification of would [ given by ron on manhattan forum ]

if 'would' appears in a sentence whose principal action is in the past tense, it's almost always functioning as a past-tense form of 'will'.
for instance:
i know that she will succeed. -- present-tense principal action (i know)
translates into the past tense as...
i knew that she would succeed. -- past-tense principal action (i knew)
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by poonam1279 » Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:43 pm
OA is E
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:22 am
its surprising I voted B, think failed to recognise past form of subjunctives...can some body restate the rules please..
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1